Modern Medicine and Vaccines - In A Nut Shell
The basic and perpetually existing problem within the circles of the pro-vaccine argument, verses the vaccine truth side of the know argument, and be explained quite simply. First of all I need to clarify what I refer to as vaccine truth argument. The pro-vaccine side for the most part incorrectly labels any information and/or person that submits information that is critical of vaccines, as being anti-vaccine. This is not necessarily to be considered as correct. Almost everyone once believed and as we were told by so called authorities, that vaccines were safe and effective. I mean, how could you argue with that; when polio gradually decreased and disappeared after the development of a vaccine. Small pox, same thing. On the surface that certainly would seem to be a rational and common sense argument. That would only be however, if you never did any independent and unbiased research that looked any further into it, and in regard to that said conclusion. That would be and remain to be as well, if you as well rejected any and all information at all that shown, and/or that you were provided that and which showed you the real truths of and as to the independently available historical information in regard to vaccines.
What we perpetually see happening is the false discreditation of and the rejection out of hand of any and all opposing information. Swiped off the debate table immediately is any and all alternative information; with the end result of that absolutely nothing would be enough. What we thus see is the complete refusal to ever believe that sources such as the CDC and WHO, have actually provided a large quantity of false and misleading information. The pro-vaccine side as well refuses to see and acknowledge, the major amount of bias that sources such as the CDC, AAP, and as well people like Paul Offit; all to obviously have. What would be the outcome if one day the CDC was forced to admit that there was existing information that highly points to such as the vaccine/autism connection? Their credibility would be instantly lost. What would happen if it were shown that they knew all along, and that they covered it up? Do you think at that point that the federal vaccine court could any longer protect them? At what point would it all become so egregious, that the tables turned entirely on them? And by that I mean in regard to the literal flattening of the vaccines are safe and effective mantra, and the entire vaccine industry. How about in regard to the flattening of the entire Western medicine health care model? Do you think that can not ever happen? Not when you realize that the entire foundation of and to modern medicine have been and were wrong from the start.
When you can show that the history that has been attempted to hidden from us all, shows the real truth; and that it always showed us the real truth in regard to the understanding of physiological health. Who was Antoine Bechamp, and how did his far more just theories show that the western medical model was indeed wrong. If you don't know what I am talking about; I suggest you do some independent research. The false germ theory; what does that involve the understanding of? I have been putting this information forward now on my website and outlining that information now already for 4 years in time. There of course remains in the face of the evidence, people that do not want to know the truth, or that can not grasp nor accept the fact that indeed the entire western medicine model is and has been incorrect, and thus literally and effectively amounts to a discounting all other information; amounts to a fabricated fabricate lie. A false concept that that has persisted in the light of the evidence that in the big picture, that the pharmaceutical means to health; has been a major failure on multiple levels. A monopolized system of health care, that largely treats only symptoms instead of actively searching for the real physiological cause and treating that cause on a holistic level.
This is the same said health care system that through one well done study originally published in the AMA Journal, shows so called modern medicine to be the third leading cause of death in the US. A second study showed by the numbers, that modern medicine, was determine to all in all the leading cause of death in the US. Additionally to be put in its proper focus, is the fact that this system of medical pharmaceutical care has it origins approximately 100 years ago. At that time all of existing and working naturopathic care was wiped out, falsely branded as quackery, and replaced with a chemical pharmaceutical form of health care. Of course they as well at that time falsely labeled all of this pharmaceutical and its additional protocols, as being science and evidence based. Nothing in the sense of truth and known reality, could be or have been more blatantly preposterous. Homeopathy for example in the previous times of holistic health care, ran hospitals and thrived in the circles of healthcare. Even the Encyclopedia Britannica in those days was bought by the Rockefeller family and their oil money; and any previous adverse information regarding vaccinations and anything else, was entirely removed and replaced with the known false propaganda. The Flexner report, how many doctors actually understand what that was, what role it played, and what it effectively did? All modern standard medical text books, today make no mention of such as Antoine Bechamp nor any others in the time frame that Pasteur lived. Individuals that as well made major contributions to the understanding of true health care; but were in that contribution their very existence erased entirely from history; as far as in regard to any acknowledgement whatsoever.
So called anti-vaccination movements have existed of course since the days of Jenner and use of the small pox vaccine What does the basic argument for and against vaccination actually and truly involve?
This argument involves first of all; a question of what information are you willing to accept? The pro vaccine side for the most part is decided into one segment of people that simply have never considered nor looked for any information at all and research other than what has been put forth by the typically advertised and considered as being authorities. There is another segment of this faction that has been exposed through online reply posting articles, pages, and forums; to a lot of the said alternative information and even the independent science showing directly the mechanisms of harm that vaccines do, and as well the links to ASD/autism. The said second set of people within this said faction of the vaccine facts argument, reject any and all such alternative information and science, and clearly for them, nothing would be enough; and no matter what. Nothing is going to be allowed to convince them of anything but that vaccines have done and that they do far more good, than verified harm.
The simple basis of the pro-vaccine argument is entirely one sided. They run with a continually fear mongering message that vaccine refusal will cause large scale sickness and death; and the return of all the so called diseases that have ever been vaccinated for. They use actually unverified statistics data from the CDC and the WHO with major claims about how many lives have been saved by vaccines. They use again actually unverified data as to and in regard to the previous numbers of cases of small pox, polio, Measles, Rubella, Pertussis, and etc. All as said are compliments of the such as the CDC and WHO; which from time to time continue to put forth their supporting of vaccines data.
The existing issue of course is in that the true historical account of it all, when you go to the independent information; does not at all match up to with what we have been told. When you go the data belonging to as well other countries than the US, in those time periods, that recorded data indeed shows that most all these illnesses/diseases were in fact already in a steady decline far before the development of a vaccine for that particular illness. When you go as well to the personal accounts put forth by people that lived in those previous time periods, such as for example those of Eleanor McBean; (The Poison Needle), you then realize how different that account of it all is, regarding such as polio and the polio vaccine, and compared to that information which we have been fed, and are told by such as the CDC and WHO. When you go articles such as The Arcane History of Polio Vaccine And Its Resulting Consequences; you as well read of entirely different account of the situation, which really points conclusively to the realization of more harm than good having been done by the polio vaccine. Increased cases of polio due to the polio vaccines, just as there were majorly increased numbers of small pox in regard to the small pox vaccine. Yet Jenner in their world falsely remains hailed as their near to being a medical genius, vaccine creating savior. Many articles and accounts of the actual history of both small pox and polio vaccines, show an entirely different outcome than what we have been clearly mislead to believe as happened. Can you imagine, and we even have as well the articles and evidence that when it was realized that the polio vaccine actually was not working and also causing increased cases of polio, instead of decreased number of cases; they simply changed and reinvented their criteria in and as to the diagnosis of polio. An act that in itself eliminated thousands of cases of existing polio in their official record.
The basic argument in the pro-vaccine verses so called anti-vaccine argument, surrounds one single issue; vaccine safety and effectiveness. The pro-vaccine side promotes their false propaganda regarding the claims of all the good vaccines have done, and in saving millions of lives. Now who could argue with that, you might say? You would not be able to argue with that, if you did not know the real truth. They simply refuse any evidence of the real truth; and move along on their way with every worn out excuse in the book to deny reality. It is simply a matter as said, of what information are you willing to accept? Are you willing to disregard all of the thousands, and it is thousands of families that have given accounts of their previously healthy child getting a vaccine such stye MMR, and/or a load of vaccines, up to nine in one day; who give all the same stories of that child becoming very ill, and then steadily with no recovery regressing into the lost state of autism, and many cases are severe? Are you willing to disregard all that, with the simple claim that association does not equal causation. 1 in 50 was the number by the latest CDC survey, with an ASD diagnosis. Are you willing to disregard that this number has risen parallel to the increase in vaccines since 1988 when vaccine makers were given a status of no legal liability, all of it taken over by the federal vaccine court?
Are you willing to disregard the fact that the cases of asthma, allergy, autism, diabetes, ADHD, autoimmune disorders, and as well cancer; have all risen in parallel to that same said increase in vaccines and vaccine doses given before the age of 6? Indeed it appears that autism is possibly only the tip of the iceberg. A hand full of studies that have been done as well have clearly pointed to that outcome being the case. Pharma can not even understand as much as in regard to the immune system that they can not put peanut oil in a vaccine as a stabilizer and/or to boost the adjuvant effect, as the result will be thousands of children with life threatening peanut allergies. So, what do they really understand correctly about the immune system at all? To actually think that just because human being eat already a substance, that it is one and the same thing, and that it can be injected without any safety testing, and that you will be without any issues; shows in reality what little they know. The dose makes the poison argument is equally as scientifically irresponsible and preposterous. That in speaking of the claims that there are only small amounts of toxic substances in vaccines. The known and obviously unresolved contamination of vaccines issue is something as well that you will never hear those on the pro vaccine side, ever speak of.
So, what you have here is the pro vaccine side pushing all the alleged good things that they claim vaccines have done, and stubbornly while entirely disregarding ANY negative effect and aspects to vaccines. Vaccines are proven safe and effective, is all you will ever hear. No, they clearly are not proven to be safe and effective, and far from it. You see you clearly can not get anywhere in this endless argument when one side refuses to learn the truth, and nor to accept any evidence of the truth. Both sides accuse the other side of near to exactly the same thing. The vaccine truther’s as we often call ourselves or at least consider ourselves to be; have battled in online debating against these people repeatedly and it is always the same outcome. Refusal of any information band sources that are no supporting the pro-vaccine agenda. They (pro-vax) repeatedly go onward with incessant message of more endless fear mongering and in the re-parroting of every false propaganda filled claim and piece of misinformation that they can muster, and that they have been fed; repeatedly refusing any evidence whatsoever to the contrary. 49 doses of 14 vaccines before the age of six; is depending on how they are counted, the current number of vaccines on the Cdc schedule. When that ever increasing number is at 60 doses of 25 vaccines and the rate of ASD is 1 in 5; will they begin to listen then? Nothing would ever be enough.
VacFacts
www.vacfacts.info
The basic and perpetually existing problem within the circles of the pro-vaccine argument, verses the vaccine truth side of the know argument, and be explained quite simply. First of all I need to clarify what I refer to as vaccine truth argument. The pro-vaccine side for the most part incorrectly labels any information and/or person that submits information that is critical of vaccines, as being anti-vaccine. This is not necessarily to be considered as correct. Almost everyone once believed and as we were told by so called authorities, that vaccines were safe and effective. I mean, how could you argue with that; when polio gradually decreased and disappeared after the development of a vaccine. Small pox, same thing. On the surface that certainly would seem to be a rational and common sense argument. That would only be however, if you never did any independent and unbiased research that looked any further into it, and in regard to that said conclusion. That would be and remain to be as well, if you as well rejected any and all information at all that shown, and/or that you were provided that and which showed you the real truths of and as to the independently available historical information in regard to vaccines.
What we perpetually see happening is the false discreditation of and the rejection out of hand of any and all opposing information. Swiped off the debate table immediately is any and all alternative information; with the end result of that absolutely nothing would be enough. What we thus see is the complete refusal to ever believe that sources such as the CDC and WHO, have actually provided a large quantity of false and misleading information. The pro-vaccine side as well refuses to see and acknowledge, the major amount of bias that sources such as the CDC, AAP, and as well people like Paul Offit; all to obviously have. What would be the outcome if one day the CDC was forced to admit that there was existing information that highly points to such as the vaccine/autism connection? Their credibility would be instantly lost. What would happen if it were shown that they knew all along, and that they covered it up? Do you think at that point that the federal vaccine court could any longer protect them? At what point would it all become so egregious, that the tables turned entirely on them? And by that I mean in regard to the literal flattening of the vaccines are safe and effective mantra, and the entire vaccine industry. How about in regard to the flattening of the entire Western medicine health care model? Do you think that can not ever happen? Not when you realize that the entire foundation of and to modern medicine have been and were wrong from the start.
When you can show that the history that has been attempted to hidden from us all, shows the real truth; and that it always showed us the real truth in regard to the understanding of physiological health. Who was Antoine Bechamp, and how did his far more just theories show that the western medical model was indeed wrong. If you don't know what I am talking about; I suggest you do some independent research. The false germ theory; what does that involve the understanding of? I have been putting this information forward now on my website and outlining that information now already for 4 years in time. There of course remains in the face of the evidence, people that do not want to know the truth, or that can not grasp nor accept the fact that indeed the entire western medicine model is and has been incorrect, and thus literally and effectively amounts to a discounting all other information; amounts to a fabricated fabricate lie. A false concept that that has persisted in the light of the evidence that in the big picture, that the pharmaceutical means to health; has been a major failure on multiple levels. A monopolized system of health care, that largely treats only symptoms instead of actively searching for the real physiological cause and treating that cause on a holistic level.
This is the same said health care system that through one well done study originally published in the AMA Journal, shows so called modern medicine to be the third leading cause of death in the US. A second study showed by the numbers, that modern medicine, was determine to all in all the leading cause of death in the US. Additionally to be put in its proper focus, is the fact that this system of medical pharmaceutical care has it origins approximately 100 years ago. At that time all of existing and working naturopathic care was wiped out, falsely branded as quackery, and replaced with a chemical pharmaceutical form of health care. Of course they as well at that time falsely labeled all of this pharmaceutical and its additional protocols, as being science and evidence based. Nothing in the sense of truth and known reality, could be or have been more blatantly preposterous. Homeopathy for example in the previous times of holistic health care, ran hospitals and thrived in the circles of healthcare. Even the Encyclopedia Britannica in those days was bought by the Rockefeller family and their oil money; and any previous adverse information regarding vaccinations and anything else, was entirely removed and replaced with the known false propaganda. The Flexner report, how many doctors actually understand what that was, what role it played, and what it effectively did? All modern standard medical text books, today make no mention of such as Antoine Bechamp nor any others in the time frame that Pasteur lived. Individuals that as well made major contributions to the understanding of true health care; but were in that contribution their very existence erased entirely from history; as far as in regard to any acknowledgement whatsoever.
So called anti-vaccination movements have existed of course since the days of Jenner and use of the small pox vaccine What does the basic argument for and against vaccination actually and truly involve?
This argument involves first of all; a question of what information are you willing to accept? The pro vaccine side for the most part is decided into one segment of people that simply have never considered nor looked for any information at all and research other than what has been put forth by the typically advertised and considered as being authorities. There is another segment of this faction that has been exposed through online reply posting articles, pages, and forums; to a lot of the said alternative information and even the independent science showing directly the mechanisms of harm that vaccines do, and as well the links to ASD/autism. The said second set of people within this said faction of the vaccine facts argument, reject any and all such alternative information and science, and clearly for them, nothing would be enough; and no matter what. Nothing is going to be allowed to convince them of anything but that vaccines have done and that they do far more good, than verified harm.
The simple basis of the pro-vaccine argument is entirely one sided. They run with a continually fear mongering message that vaccine refusal will cause large scale sickness and death; and the return of all the so called diseases that have ever been vaccinated for. They use actually unverified statistics data from the CDC and the WHO with major claims about how many lives have been saved by vaccines. They use again actually unverified data as to and in regard to the previous numbers of cases of small pox, polio, Measles, Rubella, Pertussis, and etc. All as said are compliments of the such as the CDC and WHO; which from time to time continue to put forth their supporting of vaccines data.
The existing issue of course is in that the true historical account of it all, when you go to the independent information; does not at all match up to with what we have been told. When you go the data belonging to as well other countries than the US, in those time periods, that recorded data indeed shows that most all these illnesses/diseases were in fact already in a steady decline far before the development of a vaccine for that particular illness. When you go as well to the personal accounts put forth by people that lived in those previous time periods, such as for example those of Eleanor McBean; (The Poison Needle), you then realize how different that account of it all is, regarding such as polio and the polio vaccine, and compared to that information which we have been fed, and are told by such as the CDC and WHO. When you go articles such as The Arcane History of Polio Vaccine And Its Resulting Consequences; you as well read of entirely different account of the situation, which really points conclusively to the realization of more harm than good having been done by the polio vaccine. Increased cases of polio due to the polio vaccines, just as there were majorly increased numbers of small pox in regard to the small pox vaccine. Yet Jenner in their world falsely remains hailed as their near to being a medical genius, vaccine creating savior. Many articles and accounts of the actual history of both small pox and polio vaccines, show an entirely different outcome than what we have been clearly mislead to believe as happened. Can you imagine, and we even have as well the articles and evidence that when it was realized that the polio vaccine actually was not working and also causing increased cases of polio, instead of decreased number of cases; they simply changed and reinvented their criteria in and as to the diagnosis of polio. An act that in itself eliminated thousands of cases of existing polio in their official record.
The basic argument in the pro-vaccine verses so called anti-vaccine argument, surrounds one single issue; vaccine safety and effectiveness. The pro-vaccine side promotes their false propaganda regarding the claims of all the good vaccines have done, and in saving millions of lives. Now who could argue with that, you might say? You would not be able to argue with that, if you did not know the real truth. They simply refuse any evidence of the real truth; and move along on their way with every worn out excuse in the book to deny reality. It is simply a matter as said, of what information are you willing to accept? Are you willing to disregard all of the thousands, and it is thousands of families that have given accounts of their previously healthy child getting a vaccine such stye MMR, and/or a load of vaccines, up to nine in one day; who give all the same stories of that child becoming very ill, and then steadily with no recovery regressing into the lost state of autism, and many cases are severe? Are you willing to disregard all that, with the simple claim that association does not equal causation. 1 in 50 was the number by the latest CDC survey, with an ASD diagnosis. Are you willing to disregard that this number has risen parallel to the increase in vaccines since 1988 when vaccine makers were given a status of no legal liability, all of it taken over by the federal vaccine court?
Are you willing to disregard the fact that the cases of asthma, allergy, autism, diabetes, ADHD, autoimmune disorders, and as well cancer; have all risen in parallel to that same said increase in vaccines and vaccine doses given before the age of 6? Indeed it appears that autism is possibly only the tip of the iceberg. A hand full of studies that have been done as well have clearly pointed to that outcome being the case. Pharma can not even understand as much as in regard to the immune system that they can not put peanut oil in a vaccine as a stabilizer and/or to boost the adjuvant effect, as the result will be thousands of children with life threatening peanut allergies. So, what do they really understand correctly about the immune system at all? To actually think that just because human being eat already a substance, that it is one and the same thing, and that it can be injected without any safety testing, and that you will be without any issues; shows in reality what little they know. The dose makes the poison argument is equally as scientifically irresponsible and preposterous. That in speaking of the claims that there are only small amounts of toxic substances in vaccines. The known and obviously unresolved contamination of vaccines issue is something as well that you will never hear those on the pro vaccine side, ever speak of.
So, what you have here is the pro vaccine side pushing all the alleged good things that they claim vaccines have done, and stubbornly while entirely disregarding ANY negative effect and aspects to vaccines. Vaccines are proven safe and effective, is all you will ever hear. No, they clearly are not proven to be safe and effective, and far from it. You see you clearly can not get anywhere in this endless argument when one side refuses to learn the truth, and nor to accept any evidence of the truth. Both sides accuse the other side of near to exactly the same thing. The vaccine truther’s as we often call ourselves or at least consider ourselves to be; have battled in online debating against these people repeatedly and it is always the same outcome. Refusal of any information band sources that are no supporting the pro-vaccine agenda. They (pro-vax) repeatedly go onward with incessant message of more endless fear mongering and in the re-parroting of every false propaganda filled claim and piece of misinformation that they can muster, and that they have been fed; repeatedly refusing any evidence whatsoever to the contrary. 49 doses of 14 vaccines before the age of six; is depending on how they are counted, the current number of vaccines on the Cdc schedule. When that ever increasing number is at 60 doses of 25 vaccines and the rate of ASD is 1 in 5; will they begin to listen then? Nothing would ever be enough.
VacFacts
www.vacfacts.info
