Cannabis Oil The Cancer Cure - Page Two
Cannabis/Hemp Oil - Cancer Cure (page one)
http://www.vacfacts.info/cannabishemp-oil---cancer-cure.html
Natural Protocols Recovery From Cancer
http://www.vacfacts.info/natural-protocols-recovery-from-cancer.html
Top Doctors Association Says "YES" to Medical Marijuana in Historic Endorsement
In a position paper, a leading American medical association has endorsed the medicinal use of marijuana, called for more studies of its medical uses, and urged the US government to get out of the way. The position paper from the American College of Physicians was released last Friday after being approved by the group's governing body. The American College of Physicians (ACP) is the nation's second largest doctors' organization, behind only the American Medical Association. It is made up of some 124,000 internal medicine specialists dealing primarily with adults.
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2008/feb/21/top_doctors_association_says_yes
Here is a shocking FACT, the US Government and the Department of Health and Human Services owns the 2003 patent on cannabis and in its medical use, yet they are telling the public there is no benefit, and arresting if possible, anyone that prepares it for others, and/or uses it. They clearly have had the studies to show that it works for a variety of health conditions; and they of course would have to have had that to get the existing patent.
Marijuana cures cancer – US government has known since 1974
http://patients4medicalmarijuana.wordpress.com/2010/01/04/marijuana-cures-cancer-us-government-has-known-since-1974/
Federal Government Reports Marijuana Effective in Combatting Certain Cancers Reports ADSI
http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2013/03/12/530022/10024825/en/Federal-Government-Reports-Marijuana-Effective-in-Combatting-Certain-Cancers-Reports-ADSI.html
Alert: Obama Administration Throwing Medical Marijuana Patients Into Federal Prison at Unprecedented Rate
http://www.secretsofthefed.com/alert-obama-administration-throwing-medical-marijuana-patients-into-federal-prison-at-unprecedented-rate/
True History of Marijuana Full Movie
Starting at 31:00 in the video, listen to the details of how every president has opposed in the outcome, not only any decriminalization of cannabis, but as well any medical use of even the oil. Nixon at that time, had all the evidence in front of him of the benefits as to medical use; and he literally swiped it into the trash Nixon, Janet Reno, Reagan Clinton, Bush, Obama; every one of them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E96vow07OJc
They clearly have had the studies to show that it, cannabis works for a variety of health conditions; and they would have to have had, that to get the existing patent. And where could this have gone, with federal funding to expand the science and the knowledge of the benefits of cannabis oil? Look what Rick Simpson and others have learned and done, all on their own; and these are just common people; and not actual scientists. And they put these people in prison? Land of the free and home of the brave; what a largely false delusion. With this kind of suppression of information and the for profit tyranny that goes on, NONE of us are actually free. In as well the across the board support of pharmaceuticals and modern chemicalized medicine and their protocols; all other naturopathic means to health has been labeled as unproven, if not outright quackery. The real quackery chemicalized medicine and their system, now known to be a leading cause of death in the US, by two well done studies. The first was originally published in the AMA Journal. Obviously no one is paying any attention however, nor willing to stand up and put their career and their neck on the chopping block, and up against the obvious control, monopoly, and nor the outright quackery going on within the standard medical field. And people believe this could not be silenced. All to obviously then they do not understand the powers that be, and that indeed it all has been suppressed and as well all to obviously, silenced. Should America be outraged, and all the people who have needlessly lost family to the horrid cutting, chemo, and radiation; and then ultimately even after that, to these largely failed allopathic cancer treatments? How about the millions of dollars that were wasted by patients? How about as well in regard to the decades of and the millions spent on false cancer research that was never looking for the real cause, nor the real cure? What have they actually cured, ever? They do not want real cures to anything, as pharma does not make money on real cures. Real cures come from within the body itself; the self healing body. The soil and the seed. Its just to simple. Hell yes; of course they the public should be outraged at this situation.
Death By Medicine
http://www.vacfacts.info/death-by-medicine.html
The Real History of Modern Medicine
http://www.vacfacts.info/the-real-history-of-modern-medicine.html
The False Foundations of Modern Medicine
http://www.vacfacts.info/the-false-foundations-of-modern-medicine.html
Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants
United States Patent 6,630,507
Hampson , et al. October 7, 2003
Abstract
Cannabinoids have been found to have antioxidant properties, unrelated to NMDA receptor antagonism. This new found property makes cannabinoids useful in the treatment and prophylaxis of wide variety of oxidation associated diseases, such as ischemic, age-related, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The cannabinoids are found to have particular application as neuroprotectants, for example in limiting neurological damage following ischemic insults, such as stroke and trauma, or in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and HIV dementia. Nonpsychoactive cannabinoids, such as cannabidoil, are particularly advantageous to use because they avoid toxicity that is encountered with psychoactive cannabinoids at high doses useful in the method of the present invention. A particular disclosed class of cannabinoids useful as neuroprotective antioxidants is formula (I) wherein the R group is independently selected from the group consisting of H, CH3, and COCH3. ##STR1##
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6630507.html
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN/6630507
PHYTOCANNABINOIDS IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER
Abstract
This invention relates to the use of phytocannabinoids, either in an isolated form or in the form of a botanical drug substance (BDS) in the treatment of cancer. Preferably the cancer to be treated is cancer of the prostate, cancer of the breast or cancer of the colon.
http://www.google.com/patents/EP2544682A1?cl=en
GW PHARMA LIMITED Patent applications, (here are an endless number of patents in and as to cannabis treatment of health conditions)
http://www.faqs.org/patents/assignee/gw-pharma-limited/
http://www.implu.com/patent_application/20130059018
http://www.ipmonitor.com.au/patents/case/2011225837
http://www.patentmaps.com/topic/PHYTOCANNABINOIDS_IN_THE_TREATMENT_OF_CANCER_1.html
http://www.news-medical.net/health/Phytocannabinoids.aspx
Marijuana cures cancer – US government has known since 1974
http://patients4medicalmarijuana.wordpress.com/2010/01/04/marijuana-cures-cancer-us-government-has-known-since-1974/
Run From The Cure, (full version)
The following presentation of RUN FROM THE CURE: The Rick Simpson Story was made possible by Rick Simpson and video producer Christian Laurette... made for free to teach YOU how to heal yourself of disease and illness using cannabinoids.
Comments will be moderated to protect those who need this information. We are not asking anyone if it works, we are telling you it works; it is not a debate. Too many uneducated people coming to this channel to speak their mind on a life-saving plant they know nothing about and giving bad advice and in many cases making horrible remarks about the people who brought the information out to you.
http://youtu.be/dvosdIXyjWM
The Top Five Special Interest Groups Lobbying To Keep Marijuana Illegal
Last year, more than 850,000 people in the U.S. were arrested for marijuana-related offenses.
Despite public opinion, the medical community, and human rights experts of all movement in favor of relaxing the laws of marijuana prohibition, little has changed in terms of policy.
There have been many great books and articles detailing the history of the war on drugs. Part of fixing America with maintaining green leaf plant illegal is rooted in the cultural and political clashes of the past.
However, there are entrenched interest groups that are spending large sums of money to keep the broken drug laws on the books:
1) The police unions:
2) The private prison corporations:
3) Corporations producing alcohol and beer:
4) Pharmaceutical corporations:
5) The prison guard unions:
Read more: http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/2013/03/the-five-special-interest-groups-lobbying-to-keep-marijuana-illegal.html
How Hemp Threatens the Corporatocracy
http://tv.greenmedinfo.com/how-hemp-threatens-the-corporatocracy/
http://youtu.be/ZE1sUwY_q0k
The Amazing Health Benefits of Juicing Raw Cannabis (Marijuana) Leaves
http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/2013/02/health-benefits-of-juicing-raw-cannabis.html
A long list of cannabis related studies, in relation to treatment of health conditions
http://www.cannabis-med.org/studies/study.php
GW PHARMA LIMITED, (a long list of health care related patents on cannabis oil, etc.)
http://www.faqs.org/patents/assignee/gw-pharma-limited/
Another long list of additional cannabis cures cancer studies
http://www.knowledgeoftoday.org/2012/06/fda-cancer-industry-prevent-cure.html
Mol Neurobiol. 2007 Aug;36(1):60-7. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
Cannabinoids and gliomas.
Velasco G, Carracedo A, Blázquez C, Lorente M, Aguado T, Haro A, Sánchez C, Galve-Roperh I, Guzmán M.
Source: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I, School of Biology, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
Cannabinoids, the active components of Cannabis sativa L., act in the body by mimicking endogenous substances--the endocannabinoids--that activate specific cell surface receptors. Cannabinoids exert various palliative effects in cancer patients. In addition, cannabinoids inhibit the growth of different types of tumor cells, including glioma cells, in laboratory animals. They do so by modulating key cell signaling pathways, mostly the endoplasmic reticulum stress response, thereby inducing antitumoral actions such as the apoptotic death of tumor cells and the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. Of interest, cannabinoids seem to be selective antitumoral compounds, as they kill glioma cells, but not their non-transformed astroglial counterparts. On the basis of these preclinical findings, a pilot clinical study of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme has been recently run. The good safety profile of THC, together with its possible growth-inhibiting action on tumor cells, justifies the setting up of future trials aimed at evaluating the potential antitumoral activity of cannabinoids.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17952650
Antitumor Activity of Plant Cannabinoids with Emphasis on the Effect of Cannabidiol on Human Breast Carcinoma
Abstract excerpt: At least for MDA-MB-231 cells, however, our experiments indicate that cannabidiol effect is due to its capability of inducing apoptosis via: direct or indirect activation of cannabinoid CB2 and vanilloid transient receptor potential vanilloid type-1 receptors and cannabinoid/vanilloid receptor-independent elevation of intracellular Ca2+ and reactive oxygen species. Our data support the further testing of cannabidiol and cannabidiol-rich extracts for the potential treatment of cancer.
http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/318/3/1375.abstract
The endogenous cannabinoid anandamide inhibits human breast cancer cell proliferation
Abstract excerpt: Cell proliferation was arrested by a prolactin mAb and enhanced by exogenous human prolactin, whose mitogenic action was reverted by very low (0.1–0.5 μM) doses of anandamide. Anandamide suppressed the levels of the long form of the prolactin receptor in both EFM-19 and MCF-7 cells, as well as a typical prolactin-induced response, i.e., the expression of the breast cancer cell susceptibility gene brca1. These data suggest that anandamide blocks human breast cancer cell proliferation through CB1-like receptor-mediated inhibition of endogenous prolactin action at the level of prolactin receptor.
http://www.pnas.org/content/95/14/8375.abstract
Cannabis extract makes brain tumors shrink, halts growth of blood vessels
Abstract excerpt: Cannabinoids halt VEGF production by producing Ceramide. Ceramide controls cell death.
Dr Guzmn said: "As far as we know, this is the first report showing that ceramide depresses VEGF pathway by interfering with VEGF production."
They then wanted to see if this would also happen with humans.
They selected two patients who had glioblastoma multiforme and had not responded to chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery. The scientists took samples from them before and after treating them with a cannabinoids solution - this was administered directly into the tumor.
Amazingly, both patients experienced reduced VEGF levels in the tumor as a result of treatment with cannabinoids.
The researchers said that the results were encouraging. In order to be sure about their findings they need to carry out a larger study, they said.
Dr Guzmn said "The present findings provide a novel pharmacological target for cannabinoid-based therapies."
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/12088.php
Clinical Studies and Case Reports
Abstract
Medication Delta-9-THC
Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and other cannabinoids inhibit tumour growth and angiogenesis in animal models, so their potential application as antitumoral drugs has been suggested. However, the antitumoral effect of cannabinoids has never been tested in humans. Here we report the first clinical study aimed at assessing cannabinoid antitumoral action, specifically a pilot phase I trial in which nine patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme were administered THC intratumoraly. The patients had previously failed standard therapy (surgery and radiotherapy) and had clear evidence of tumour progression. The primary end point of the study was to determine the safety of intracranial THC administration. We also evaluated THC action on the length of survival and various tumour-cell parameters. A dose escalation regimen for THC administration was assessed. Cannabinoid delivery was safe and could be achieved without overt psychoactive effects. Median survival of the cohort from the beginning of cannabinoid administration was 24 weeks (95% confidence interval: 15-33). Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol inhibited tumour-cell proliferation in vitro and decreased tumour-cell Ki67 immunostaining when administered to two patients. The fair safety profile of THC, together with its possible antiproliferative action on tumour cells reported here and in other studies, may set the basis for future trials aimed at evaluating the potential antitumoral activity of cannabinoids. British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 27 June 2006; doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603236 www.bjcancer.com.
http://www.cannabis-med.org/studies/ww_en_db_study_show.php?s_id=193
The Surprising True Causes of Cancer: Revealed by Dr. Coldwell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX49Q1A8_PE&feature=share
There will never be within the cancer industry, a real cure for cancer, nor childhood cancer; and that beyond what already exists, being pharmaceutical drugs, radiation, chemo, and surgery. In the last 80 years there have been several effective cures for cancer, and all of them have been attacked, the people using it slandered, and falsely the treatment sent to the unproven literal quackery file. All while the in the over-all picture the largely failed traditional treatments continue to operate, business as usual. When it comes to cancer; you can not patent for large profits, real physiological understanding, nor natural protocols, substances, nor foods and nutrition that heal.
Proof that the cancer industry doesn't want a cure - even if it's a pharmaceutical.
http://www.naturalnews.com/034823_cancer_industry_patent_protection_drugs.html
Breast Cancer Treatment Cost. How Much Does Breast Cancer Treatment Cost?
The total cost to treat a single case of breast cancer can run from 100,000 to $300,000; (Think they are giving, that up?)
Read more: http://health.costhelper.com/breast-cancer.html
The costly war on cancer.
Cancer plays a huge role in raising costs. America's National Institutes of Health predict that spending on all cancer treatment will rise from $125 billion last year to at least $158 billion in 2020. If drugs become pricier, as seems likely, that bill could rise to $207 billion.
Not all these new drugs work. In December the FDA said that Avastin's side effects outweighed its meagre impact on breast cancer. (Genentech will argue otherwise in a hearing in June.) More generally, some people reckon that new cancer drugs offer small benefits at an exorbitant price. Provenge costs $93,000 for a course of treatment and extends life by an average of four months. Yervoy costs $120,000 for three-and-a-half months.
These new drugs sell well. Last year Gleevec grossed $4.3 billion. Roche's Herceptin (the HER2 drug) and Avastin did even better: $6 billion and $7.4 billion respectively. Cancer drugs could rescue big drugmakers from a tricky situation: more than $50 billion-worth of wares will lose patent protection in the next three years. (Think they are giving, that up?)
http://www.economist.com/node/18743951
The "Race for the Cure" scam exposed: The cancer industry's guilt-powered shakedown of a gullible public.
http://www.naturalnews.com/020648_cancer_breast.html
Komen for the Cure caught in mammography propaganda fraud; scientists blast agenda of deception.
http://www.naturalnews.com/036711_Komen_for_the_Cure_mammography_fraud.html
Boycott Komen's Race for the Cure events, sham cancer fundraisers prey on pinkwashing quackery.
http://www.naturalnews.com/034987_race_for_the_cure_breast_cancer_pinkwashing.html
Run for the cure races are a scheme to raise money for pharmaceutical companies, says nutritionist.
http://www.naturalnews.com/020600_cancer_industry_politics.html
Mammograms cause breast cancer (and other cancer facts you probably never knew)
http://www.naturalnews.com/010886_breast_cancer_mammograms.html
Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You're Not Supposed to Know (opinion)
http://www.naturalnews.com/024536_cancer_women_breast.html
Richard Nixon signs the National Cancer Act of 1971
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qX8d1vOI8l8
The War on Cancer: 41 Years after Nixon’s Declaration
Lecture title: The War on Cancer: 41 Years after President Nixon's Declaration
http://www.esi.utexas.edu/k-12-a-the-community/hot-science-cool-talks/the-war-on-cancer-41-years-after-nixons-declaration
The War On Cancer Turns 40
http://www.npr.org/2011/12/23/144190091/the-war-on-cancer-turns-40
Are We Wasting Billions Seeking a Cure for Cancer?
Oct 2, 2012 4:45 AM EDT
More than 40 years after Nixon launched the war on cancer, we are not much closer to curing the disease. Why? Because finding a cure is the wrong goal, says doctor Margaret Cuomo.
More than 40 years after the war on cancer was declared, we have spent billions fighting the good fight. The National Cancer Institute has spent some $90 billion on research and treatment during that time. Some 260 nonprofit organizations in the United States have dedicated themselves to cancer—more than the number established for heart disease, AIDS, Alzheimer’s disease, and stroke combined. Together, these 260 organizations have budgets that top $2.2 billion.
As a result, we know much more about the disease than we once did, but we are not much closer to curing it. From 1975 to 2007, breast cancer rates increased by one third and prostate cancer rates soared by 50 percent. Widespread screening played a significant role in detecting these cases, making direct comparisons difficult. Still we clearly have a problem. Almost 1.6 million people were diagnosed with cancer in 2011. Meanwhile, the rates of certain cancers are rising. An upward trend is especially apparent in kidney, liver, and thyroid cancer and in melanoma and lymphoma. The steady increase in the incidence of childhood leukemia and brain cancer since the mid-1970s is a particularly alarming trend. When have Americans ever waged such a long, drawn-out, and costly war, with no end in sight?
It’s true there have been small declines in some common cancers since the early 1990s, including male lung cancer and colon and rectal cancer in both men and women. And the fall in the cancer death rate—by approximately 1 percent a year since 1990—has been slightly more impressive. Still, that’s hardly cause for celebration. Cancer’s role in one out of every four deaths in this country remains a haunting statistic.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/02/are-we-wasting-billions-seeking-a-cure-for-cancer.html
The (evil) cancer industry exposed by medical doctors.
http://www.naturalnews.com/035582_cancer_industry_exposed_medical_doctors.html
Did this grandfather, 78, really beat 'incurable' cancer just by changing his diet?
Extraordinary story of the man who got 'all-clear' after swapping red meat and dairy products for 10 fruit and veg a day. Doctors told Allan Taylor, 78, in April that his cancer couldn't be treated and had spread from his colon to his small intestine. In August the retired oil rig engineer from Middlesbrough got another letter - to say he was cancer-free. He puts the change down to his new diet, which he adopted after looking up 'colon cancer cures' on the internet
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2204080/Grandfather-incurable-cancer-given-clear-swapping-red-meat-dairy-products-10-fruit-veg-day.html
THIS should NOT be a surprise. Naturopathic means to health care has been reversing cancer by diet for already 60 years; and it has all been run in the dirt, ignored suppressed and riddled as quackery; with no proof ever being enough. All so the standing cancer industry can survive, and as well its billion dollar profits, and with as well all of their high dollar careers. Nothing is enough, nor ever will be, to get them to stop with their majorly failed monopoly on health care; and the suppression of truth.
About the Gerson Therapy, (now, if you combined THIS, and this knowledge, with cannabis oil)
This nutrition-based therapy is best known for its success in curing cancer, but it is also a highly effective treatment for a wide range of chronic degenerative conditions, which even the most advanced allopathic methods can only alleviate but not cure. It must be understood that the Gerson protocol is no miracle cure and, like other medical treatments, can offer no guarantee of success; however, it has an extraordinary seventy-year track record in healing widespread chronic diseases, such as: Read more:
http://gersontherapy.eu/therapy/gerson_therapy
http://gerson.org/gerpress/the-gerson-therapy/
Some people it has been found can thrive on the vegan diet very well, and some can not and need animal protein and other nutrient substances existing in that. I think personally you can as well do it with a balance of both.
Another source:
WHAT IS THE HALLELUJAH DIET?
The Hallelujah Diet is a menu of 85% raw, uncooked, and unprocessed plant-based food, and 15% cooked, plant-based food.
Why Plant-based Foods? Read more:
http://www.hacres.com/hallelujah-diet/explanation
Simply Raw: Reversing Diabetes in 30 Days
http://www.rawfor30days.com/
Look at the reality of the cancer research walks and runs, as far as the money that goes to the American Cancer Society and others within the main stream which are at best only looking at or for pharmaceutical drugs, and/or only improving the existing systems of delivery, in that endeavor to cure cancer. How many millions have they taken in ans spent on research that has never produced anything even close to what the public obviously was expecting and would expect from it? You will again remember how long ago it was that Richard Nixon signed the document intending to authorize the War on Cancer. In 40 years what have they gained what; after endless millions have been spent chasing a so called cancer cure? The situation with cancer has become worse, not better. If they cured a few more people, they as well had twice as many more people get cancer. They are clearly NOT looking for the real cure; not any real understanding.
They can not even get the ph issue honestly addressed, nor that sugar actually feeds cancer; they intentionally ignore it all. It has been all of it right in front of them. The cure has been there since Rene Cassie developed Essiac tea, Otto Warburg discovered what he did. Since Johanna Budwig made her discovery. Since Max Gerson made his discovery. Since Royal Rife and others made theirs. You do NOT heal with poison. The cure is found in detoxification, correction of ph, elimination of all sugars that feed cancer; and the cure is found in providing the body with the nutrition to in effect, heal itself. The medical establishment has it all backwards. They think you have to kill every pathogen and organism out there, to heal or cure anything; even if that means killing the patient before they kill the cancer. This is not the case and they have it all backwards. You can NOT patent foods and nutrients nor natural substances and products. Thus there is no major alteration of resulting chemical product which can result in a mark up of 5000% to 20,000%, as is typical. How would you ever make what they do on chemo and radiation, up to $300,000 per patient; selling organic whole foods and green vegetable and fruit juicing machines, or perhaps ESSIAC tea? How about flax seed oil and cottage cheese. Think I am kidding? This is real, all of it.
This is reality it is all at. They do not care how many needlessly suffer and die for their need of profits, obvious security, and their GREED! Burzynski, look at that issue in depth, and see what I mean. The Texas state board and the FDA have hounded and attacked him (Dr. Burzynski) for over 20 years; and still no cure, (and nor his Antineoplastons cure approved). He, Burzynski, cures brain stem and brain cancer that mainstream has never been able to cure. And the children and adults keep dying because they refuse a better way that KNOW would make standard chemo and radiation obsolete, and their high dollar drugs and, surgery, obsolete. Is this criminal in nature. If is isn't; then what exactly would qualify as criminal, and what exactly would that take, to actually be? http://www.burzynskimovie.com/
Sugar Loves Cancer
Cancer Loves Sugar
Every doctor learned back in medical school all about Otto Warburg's discovery; a discovery of humongous proportions, because way back in the thirties Otto discovered the main biochemical cause of cancer, or what differentiates a cancer cell from a normal, healthy cell. So big a discovery was this, that Otto Warburg was awarded the Nobel Prize.
Cancer has only one prime cause. It is the replacement of normal oxygen respiration of the body's cells by an anaerobic [i.e., oxygen-deficient] cell respiration. -Dr. Otto Warburg
But what else does Warburg's discovery tell us. First off, it tells us that cancer metabolizes much differently than normal cells. Normal cells need oxygen. Cancer cells despise oxygen. In fact, oxygen therapy is a favorite among many of the alternative clinics we've researched.
Another thing this tells us is that cancer metabolizes through a process of fermentation.
If you've ever made wine, you'll know that fermentation requires sugar.
The metabolism of cancer is approximately 8 times greater than the metabolism of normal cells.
Okay, so here is what we can put together knowing the above: The body is constantly overworked trying to feed this cancer. The cancer is constantly on the verge starvation and thus constantly asking the body to feed it. When the food supply is cut off, the cancer begins to starve unless it can make the body produce sugar to feed itself.
The wasting syndrome, cachexia, is the body producing sugar from proteins (you heard it right, not from carbohydrates or fats, but from proteins) in a process called glycogenesis. This sugar feeds the cancer. The body finally dies of starvation, trying to feed the cancer.
Now, knowing that one's cancer needs sugar, does it make sense to feed it sugar? Does it make sense to have a high carbohydrate diet?
The reason Food Therapies for cancer even exist today (beyond the fact that they work) is because someone once saw the connection between sugar and cancer. There are many food therapies, but not a single one allows many foods high in carbohydrates and not a single one allows sugars, BECAUSE SUGAR FEEDS CANCER.
Why doesn't your physician tell you this? Hard to tell. Maybe your doctor feels it is his job to cure your cancer, not yours. Maybe because your doctor learned about Warburg, but never put the rest together, never placed nutrition into the equation. Maybe because your physician didn't study nutrition. Heck, as late as 1978, the AMA's official position (found in the Congressional Record) was that nutrition had nothing to do with disease.
However, those who've paid attention to this sugar craving cancer stuff have come up with some remarkable therapies for cancer. Laetrile is just one. Hydrazine Sulfate, which stops the process of glycogenesis in greater than 50% of all patients with cachexia is another.
A while back (2004), at the University of Minnesota, they were experimenting with a chemotherapy delivered in a "smartbomb." Here's the scoop: the drug is wrapped in a coating that stays intact as it travels through the body, that is until it reaches a location of no oxygen. When it reaches this "no oxygen" location, the coating falls apart releasing the chemotherapy to destroy the cancer, because the only place in your body where there is no oxygen is the cancer site.
The results of this study have been buried. Nothing exists on it. There are, however, lots of articles on cancer smart bombs, but the UofMN research just cannot be found. Searching for a few key words, we've found only our article (republished at quite a few sites) mentioning this study.
Then there are the food therapies: aimed at starving cancer. Knowing what cancer loves, the cancer patient avoids them. Cancers likes cooked foods over raw (cooking destroys enzymes and heat sensitive vitamins), so check out our article on the cancer diet. And, do not forget, cancer loves sugar. If you dislike your cancer, then don't feed it.
http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/nutrition/sugar.htm
More Evidence Sugar Feeds Cancer
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2006/07/18/more-evidence-sugar-feeds-cancer.aspx
Science News
Does Sugar Feed Cancer?
Aug. 18, 2009 — Researchers at Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah have uncovered new information on the notion that sugar "feeds" tumors. The findings may also have implications for other diseases such as diabetes. The research is published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
"It's been known since 1923 that tumor cells use a lot more glucose than normal cells. Our research helps show how this process takes place, and how it might be stopped to control tumor growth," says Don Ayer, Ph.D., a Huntsman Cancer Institute investigator and professor in the Department of Oncological Sciences at the University of Utah.
During both normal and cancerous cell growth, a cellular process takes place that involves both glucose (sugar) and glutamine (an amino acid). Glucose and glutamine are both essential for cell growth, and it was long assumed they operated independently, but Ayer's research shows they are inter-dependent. He discovered that by restricting glutamine availability, glucose utilization is also stopped. "Essentially, if you don't have glutamine, the cell is short circuited due to a lack of glucose, which halts the growth of the tumor cell" Ayer says.
The research, spearheaded by Mohan Kaadige, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow in Ayer's lab, focused on MondoA, a protein that is responsible for turning genes on and off. In the presence of glutamine, MondoA blocks the expression of a gene called TXNIP. TXNIP is thought to be a tumor suppressor, but when it's blocked by MondoA , it allows cells to take up glucose, which in turn drives tumor growth. Ayer's research could lead to new drugs that would target glutamine utilization, or target MondoA or TXNIP.
Ayer says the next step in his research is to develop animal models to test his ideas about how MondoA and TXNIP control cell growth. "If we can understand that, we can break the cycle of glucose utilization which could be beneficial in the treatment of cancer," Ayer says.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090817184539.htm
Cancer & Sugar - Strategy for Selective Starvation of Cancer
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cancer-sugar-strategy-selective-starvation-cancer
Alkaline Forming Foods For A Balanced And Healthy Diet
http://www.budwigcenter.com/blog/alkaline-forming-foods-for-a-balanced-and-healthy-diet/#.US0_ajDIOWY
Cannabis/Hemp Oil - Cancer Cure (page one)
http://www.vacfacts.info/cannabishemp-oil---cancer-cure.html
Natural Protocols Recovery From Cancer
http://www.vacfacts.info/natural-protocols-recovery-from-cancer.html
Top Doctors Association Says "YES" to Medical Marijuana in Historic Endorsement
In a position paper, a leading American medical association has endorsed the medicinal use of marijuana, called for more studies of its medical uses, and urged the US government to get out of the way. The position paper from the American College of Physicians was released last Friday after being approved by the group's governing body. The American College of Physicians (ACP) is the nation's second largest doctors' organization, behind only the American Medical Association. It is made up of some 124,000 internal medicine specialists dealing primarily with adults.
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2008/feb/21/top_doctors_association_says_yes
Here is a shocking FACT, the US Government and the Department of Health and Human Services owns the 2003 patent on cannabis and in its medical use, yet they are telling the public there is no benefit, and arresting if possible, anyone that prepares it for others, and/or uses it. They clearly have had the studies to show that it works for a variety of health conditions; and they of course would have to have had that to get the existing patent.
Marijuana cures cancer – US government has known since 1974
http://patients4medicalmarijuana.wordpress.com/2010/01/04/marijuana-cures-cancer-us-government-has-known-since-1974/
Federal Government Reports Marijuana Effective in Combatting Certain Cancers Reports ADSI
http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2013/03/12/530022/10024825/en/Federal-Government-Reports-Marijuana-Effective-in-Combatting-Certain-Cancers-Reports-ADSI.html
Alert: Obama Administration Throwing Medical Marijuana Patients Into Federal Prison at Unprecedented Rate
http://www.secretsofthefed.com/alert-obama-administration-throwing-medical-marijuana-patients-into-federal-prison-at-unprecedented-rate/
True History of Marijuana Full Movie
Starting at 31:00 in the video, listen to the details of how every president has opposed in the outcome, not only any decriminalization of cannabis, but as well any medical use of even the oil. Nixon at that time, had all the evidence in front of him of the benefits as to medical use; and he literally swiped it into the trash Nixon, Janet Reno, Reagan Clinton, Bush, Obama; every one of them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E96vow07OJc
They clearly have had the studies to show that it, cannabis works for a variety of health conditions; and they would have to have had, that to get the existing patent. And where could this have gone, with federal funding to expand the science and the knowledge of the benefits of cannabis oil? Look what Rick Simpson and others have learned and done, all on their own; and these are just common people; and not actual scientists. And they put these people in prison? Land of the free and home of the brave; what a largely false delusion. With this kind of suppression of information and the for profit tyranny that goes on, NONE of us are actually free. In as well the across the board support of pharmaceuticals and modern chemicalized medicine and their protocols; all other naturopathic means to health has been labeled as unproven, if not outright quackery. The real quackery chemicalized medicine and their system, now known to be a leading cause of death in the US, by two well done studies. The first was originally published in the AMA Journal. Obviously no one is paying any attention however, nor willing to stand up and put their career and their neck on the chopping block, and up against the obvious control, monopoly, and nor the outright quackery going on within the standard medical field. And people believe this could not be silenced. All to obviously then they do not understand the powers that be, and that indeed it all has been suppressed and as well all to obviously, silenced. Should America be outraged, and all the people who have needlessly lost family to the horrid cutting, chemo, and radiation; and then ultimately even after that, to these largely failed allopathic cancer treatments? How about the millions of dollars that were wasted by patients? How about as well in regard to the decades of and the millions spent on false cancer research that was never looking for the real cause, nor the real cure? What have they actually cured, ever? They do not want real cures to anything, as pharma does not make money on real cures. Real cures come from within the body itself; the self healing body. The soil and the seed. Its just to simple. Hell yes; of course they the public should be outraged at this situation.
Death By Medicine
http://www.vacfacts.info/death-by-medicine.html
The Real History of Modern Medicine
http://www.vacfacts.info/the-real-history-of-modern-medicine.html
The False Foundations of Modern Medicine
http://www.vacfacts.info/the-false-foundations-of-modern-medicine.html
Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants
United States Patent 6,630,507
Hampson , et al. October 7, 2003
Abstract
Cannabinoids have been found to have antioxidant properties, unrelated to NMDA receptor antagonism. This new found property makes cannabinoids useful in the treatment and prophylaxis of wide variety of oxidation associated diseases, such as ischemic, age-related, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The cannabinoids are found to have particular application as neuroprotectants, for example in limiting neurological damage following ischemic insults, such as stroke and trauma, or in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and HIV dementia. Nonpsychoactive cannabinoids, such as cannabidoil, are particularly advantageous to use because they avoid toxicity that is encountered with psychoactive cannabinoids at high doses useful in the method of the present invention. A particular disclosed class of cannabinoids useful as neuroprotective antioxidants is formula (I) wherein the R group is independently selected from the group consisting of H, CH3, and COCH3. ##STR1##
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6630507.html
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN/6630507
PHYTOCANNABINOIDS IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER
Abstract
This invention relates to the use of phytocannabinoids, either in an isolated form or in the form of a botanical drug substance (BDS) in the treatment of cancer. Preferably the cancer to be treated is cancer of the prostate, cancer of the breast or cancer of the colon.
http://www.google.com/patents/EP2544682A1?cl=en
GW PHARMA LIMITED Patent applications, (here are an endless number of patents in and as to cannabis treatment of health conditions)
http://www.faqs.org/patents/assignee/gw-pharma-limited/
http://www.implu.com/patent_application/20130059018
http://www.ipmonitor.com.au/patents/case/2011225837
http://www.patentmaps.com/topic/PHYTOCANNABINOIDS_IN_THE_TREATMENT_OF_CANCER_1.html
http://www.news-medical.net/health/Phytocannabinoids.aspx
Marijuana cures cancer – US government has known since 1974
http://patients4medicalmarijuana.wordpress.com/2010/01/04/marijuana-cures-cancer-us-government-has-known-since-1974/
Run From The Cure, (full version)
The following presentation of RUN FROM THE CURE: The Rick Simpson Story was made possible by Rick Simpson and video producer Christian Laurette... made for free to teach YOU how to heal yourself of disease and illness using cannabinoids.
Comments will be moderated to protect those who need this information. We are not asking anyone if it works, we are telling you it works; it is not a debate. Too many uneducated people coming to this channel to speak their mind on a life-saving plant they know nothing about and giving bad advice and in many cases making horrible remarks about the people who brought the information out to you.
http://youtu.be/dvosdIXyjWM
The Top Five Special Interest Groups Lobbying To Keep Marijuana Illegal
Last year, more than 850,000 people in the U.S. were arrested for marijuana-related offenses.
Despite public opinion, the medical community, and human rights experts of all movement in favor of relaxing the laws of marijuana prohibition, little has changed in terms of policy.
There have been many great books and articles detailing the history of the war on drugs. Part of fixing America with maintaining green leaf plant illegal is rooted in the cultural and political clashes of the past.
However, there are entrenched interest groups that are spending large sums of money to keep the broken drug laws on the books:
1) The police unions:
2) The private prison corporations:
3) Corporations producing alcohol and beer:
4) Pharmaceutical corporations:
5) The prison guard unions:
Read more: http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/2013/03/the-five-special-interest-groups-lobbying-to-keep-marijuana-illegal.html
How Hemp Threatens the Corporatocracy
http://tv.greenmedinfo.com/how-hemp-threatens-the-corporatocracy/
http://youtu.be/ZE1sUwY_q0k
The Amazing Health Benefits of Juicing Raw Cannabis (Marijuana) Leaves
http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/2013/02/health-benefits-of-juicing-raw-cannabis.html
A long list of cannabis related studies, in relation to treatment of health conditions
http://www.cannabis-med.org/studies/study.php
GW PHARMA LIMITED, (a long list of health care related patents on cannabis oil, etc.)
http://www.faqs.org/patents/assignee/gw-pharma-limited/
Another long list of additional cannabis cures cancer studies
http://www.knowledgeoftoday.org/2012/06/fda-cancer-industry-prevent-cure.html
Mol Neurobiol. 2007 Aug;36(1):60-7. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
Cannabinoids and gliomas.
Velasco G, Carracedo A, Blázquez C, Lorente M, Aguado T, Haro A, Sánchez C, Galve-Roperh I, Guzmán M.
Source: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I, School of Biology, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
Cannabinoids, the active components of Cannabis sativa L., act in the body by mimicking endogenous substances--the endocannabinoids--that activate specific cell surface receptors. Cannabinoids exert various palliative effects in cancer patients. In addition, cannabinoids inhibit the growth of different types of tumor cells, including glioma cells, in laboratory animals. They do so by modulating key cell signaling pathways, mostly the endoplasmic reticulum stress response, thereby inducing antitumoral actions such as the apoptotic death of tumor cells and the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. Of interest, cannabinoids seem to be selective antitumoral compounds, as they kill glioma cells, but not their non-transformed astroglial counterparts. On the basis of these preclinical findings, a pilot clinical study of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme has been recently run. The good safety profile of THC, together with its possible growth-inhibiting action on tumor cells, justifies the setting up of future trials aimed at evaluating the potential antitumoral activity of cannabinoids.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17952650
Antitumor Activity of Plant Cannabinoids with Emphasis on the Effect of Cannabidiol on Human Breast Carcinoma
Abstract excerpt: At least for MDA-MB-231 cells, however, our experiments indicate that cannabidiol effect is due to its capability of inducing apoptosis via: direct or indirect activation of cannabinoid CB2 and vanilloid transient receptor potential vanilloid type-1 receptors and cannabinoid/vanilloid receptor-independent elevation of intracellular Ca2+ and reactive oxygen species. Our data support the further testing of cannabidiol and cannabidiol-rich extracts for the potential treatment of cancer.
http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/318/3/1375.abstract
The endogenous cannabinoid anandamide inhibits human breast cancer cell proliferation
Abstract excerpt: Cell proliferation was arrested by a prolactin mAb and enhanced by exogenous human prolactin, whose mitogenic action was reverted by very low (0.1–0.5 μM) doses of anandamide. Anandamide suppressed the levels of the long form of the prolactin receptor in both EFM-19 and MCF-7 cells, as well as a typical prolactin-induced response, i.e., the expression of the breast cancer cell susceptibility gene brca1. These data suggest that anandamide blocks human breast cancer cell proliferation through CB1-like receptor-mediated inhibition of endogenous prolactin action at the level of prolactin receptor.
http://www.pnas.org/content/95/14/8375.abstract
Cannabis extract makes brain tumors shrink, halts growth of blood vessels
Abstract excerpt: Cannabinoids halt VEGF production by producing Ceramide. Ceramide controls cell death.
Dr Guzmn said: "As far as we know, this is the first report showing that ceramide depresses VEGF pathway by interfering with VEGF production."
They then wanted to see if this would also happen with humans.
They selected two patients who had glioblastoma multiforme and had not responded to chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery. The scientists took samples from them before and after treating them with a cannabinoids solution - this was administered directly into the tumor.
Amazingly, both patients experienced reduced VEGF levels in the tumor as a result of treatment with cannabinoids.
The researchers said that the results were encouraging. In order to be sure about their findings they need to carry out a larger study, they said.
Dr Guzmn said "The present findings provide a novel pharmacological target for cannabinoid-based therapies."
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/12088.php
Clinical Studies and Case Reports
Abstract
Medication Delta-9-THC
Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and other cannabinoids inhibit tumour growth and angiogenesis in animal models, so their potential application as antitumoral drugs has been suggested. However, the antitumoral effect of cannabinoids has never been tested in humans. Here we report the first clinical study aimed at assessing cannabinoid antitumoral action, specifically a pilot phase I trial in which nine patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme were administered THC intratumoraly. The patients had previously failed standard therapy (surgery and radiotherapy) and had clear evidence of tumour progression. The primary end point of the study was to determine the safety of intracranial THC administration. We also evaluated THC action on the length of survival and various tumour-cell parameters. A dose escalation regimen for THC administration was assessed. Cannabinoid delivery was safe and could be achieved without overt psychoactive effects. Median survival of the cohort from the beginning of cannabinoid administration was 24 weeks (95% confidence interval: 15-33). Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol inhibited tumour-cell proliferation in vitro and decreased tumour-cell Ki67 immunostaining when administered to two patients. The fair safety profile of THC, together with its possible antiproliferative action on tumour cells reported here and in other studies, may set the basis for future trials aimed at evaluating the potential antitumoral activity of cannabinoids. British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 27 June 2006; doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603236 www.bjcancer.com.
http://www.cannabis-med.org/studies/ww_en_db_study_show.php?s_id=193
The Surprising True Causes of Cancer: Revealed by Dr. Coldwell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX49Q1A8_PE&feature=share
There will never be within the cancer industry, a real cure for cancer, nor childhood cancer; and that beyond what already exists, being pharmaceutical drugs, radiation, chemo, and surgery. In the last 80 years there have been several effective cures for cancer, and all of them have been attacked, the people using it slandered, and falsely the treatment sent to the unproven literal quackery file. All while the in the over-all picture the largely failed traditional treatments continue to operate, business as usual. When it comes to cancer; you can not patent for large profits, real physiological understanding, nor natural protocols, substances, nor foods and nutrition that heal.
Proof that the cancer industry doesn't want a cure - even if it's a pharmaceutical.
http://www.naturalnews.com/034823_cancer_industry_patent_protection_drugs.html
Breast Cancer Treatment Cost. How Much Does Breast Cancer Treatment Cost?
The total cost to treat a single case of breast cancer can run from 100,000 to $300,000; (Think they are giving, that up?)
Read more: http://health.costhelper.com/breast-cancer.html
The costly war on cancer.
Cancer plays a huge role in raising costs. America's National Institutes of Health predict that spending on all cancer treatment will rise from $125 billion last year to at least $158 billion in 2020. If drugs become pricier, as seems likely, that bill could rise to $207 billion.
Not all these new drugs work. In December the FDA said that Avastin's side effects outweighed its meagre impact on breast cancer. (Genentech will argue otherwise in a hearing in June.) More generally, some people reckon that new cancer drugs offer small benefits at an exorbitant price. Provenge costs $93,000 for a course of treatment and extends life by an average of four months. Yervoy costs $120,000 for three-and-a-half months.
These new drugs sell well. Last year Gleevec grossed $4.3 billion. Roche's Herceptin (the HER2 drug) and Avastin did even better: $6 billion and $7.4 billion respectively. Cancer drugs could rescue big drugmakers from a tricky situation: more than $50 billion-worth of wares will lose patent protection in the next three years. (Think they are giving, that up?)
http://www.economist.com/node/18743951
The "Race for the Cure" scam exposed: The cancer industry's guilt-powered shakedown of a gullible public.
http://www.naturalnews.com/020648_cancer_breast.html
Komen for the Cure caught in mammography propaganda fraud; scientists blast agenda of deception.
http://www.naturalnews.com/036711_Komen_for_the_Cure_mammography_fraud.html
Boycott Komen's Race for the Cure events, sham cancer fundraisers prey on pinkwashing quackery.
http://www.naturalnews.com/034987_race_for_the_cure_breast_cancer_pinkwashing.html
Run for the cure races are a scheme to raise money for pharmaceutical companies, says nutritionist.
http://www.naturalnews.com/020600_cancer_industry_politics.html
Mammograms cause breast cancer (and other cancer facts you probably never knew)
http://www.naturalnews.com/010886_breast_cancer_mammograms.html
Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You're Not Supposed to Know (opinion)
http://www.naturalnews.com/024536_cancer_women_breast.html
Richard Nixon signs the National Cancer Act of 1971
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qX8d1vOI8l8
The War on Cancer: 41 Years after Nixon’s Declaration
Lecture title: The War on Cancer: 41 Years after President Nixon's Declaration
http://www.esi.utexas.edu/k-12-a-the-community/hot-science-cool-talks/the-war-on-cancer-41-years-after-nixons-declaration
The War On Cancer Turns 40
http://www.npr.org/2011/12/23/144190091/the-war-on-cancer-turns-40
Are We Wasting Billions Seeking a Cure for Cancer?
Oct 2, 2012 4:45 AM EDT
More than 40 years after Nixon launched the war on cancer, we are not much closer to curing the disease. Why? Because finding a cure is the wrong goal, says doctor Margaret Cuomo.
More than 40 years after the war on cancer was declared, we have spent billions fighting the good fight. The National Cancer Institute has spent some $90 billion on research and treatment during that time. Some 260 nonprofit organizations in the United States have dedicated themselves to cancer—more than the number established for heart disease, AIDS, Alzheimer’s disease, and stroke combined. Together, these 260 organizations have budgets that top $2.2 billion.
As a result, we know much more about the disease than we once did, but we are not much closer to curing it. From 1975 to 2007, breast cancer rates increased by one third and prostate cancer rates soared by 50 percent. Widespread screening played a significant role in detecting these cases, making direct comparisons difficult. Still we clearly have a problem. Almost 1.6 million people were diagnosed with cancer in 2011. Meanwhile, the rates of certain cancers are rising. An upward trend is especially apparent in kidney, liver, and thyroid cancer and in melanoma and lymphoma. The steady increase in the incidence of childhood leukemia and brain cancer since the mid-1970s is a particularly alarming trend. When have Americans ever waged such a long, drawn-out, and costly war, with no end in sight?
It’s true there have been small declines in some common cancers since the early 1990s, including male lung cancer and colon and rectal cancer in both men and women. And the fall in the cancer death rate—by approximately 1 percent a year since 1990—has been slightly more impressive. Still, that’s hardly cause for celebration. Cancer’s role in one out of every four deaths in this country remains a haunting statistic.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/02/are-we-wasting-billions-seeking-a-cure-for-cancer.html
The (evil) cancer industry exposed by medical doctors.
http://www.naturalnews.com/035582_cancer_industry_exposed_medical_doctors.html
Did this grandfather, 78, really beat 'incurable' cancer just by changing his diet?
Extraordinary story of the man who got 'all-clear' after swapping red meat and dairy products for 10 fruit and veg a day. Doctors told Allan Taylor, 78, in April that his cancer couldn't be treated and had spread from his colon to his small intestine. In August the retired oil rig engineer from Middlesbrough got another letter - to say he was cancer-free. He puts the change down to his new diet, which he adopted after looking up 'colon cancer cures' on the internet
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2204080/Grandfather-incurable-cancer-given-clear-swapping-red-meat-dairy-products-10-fruit-veg-day.html
THIS should NOT be a surprise. Naturopathic means to health care has been reversing cancer by diet for already 60 years; and it has all been run in the dirt, ignored suppressed and riddled as quackery; with no proof ever being enough. All so the standing cancer industry can survive, and as well its billion dollar profits, and with as well all of their high dollar careers. Nothing is enough, nor ever will be, to get them to stop with their majorly failed monopoly on health care; and the suppression of truth.
About the Gerson Therapy, (now, if you combined THIS, and this knowledge, with cannabis oil)
This nutrition-based therapy is best known for its success in curing cancer, but it is also a highly effective treatment for a wide range of chronic degenerative conditions, which even the most advanced allopathic methods can only alleviate but not cure. It must be understood that the Gerson protocol is no miracle cure and, like other medical treatments, can offer no guarantee of success; however, it has an extraordinary seventy-year track record in healing widespread chronic diseases, such as: Read more:
http://gersontherapy.eu/therapy/gerson_therapy
http://gerson.org/gerpress/the-gerson-therapy/
Some people it has been found can thrive on the vegan diet very well, and some can not and need animal protein and other nutrient substances existing in that. I think personally you can as well do it with a balance of both.
Another source:
WHAT IS THE HALLELUJAH DIET?
The Hallelujah Diet is a menu of 85% raw, uncooked, and unprocessed plant-based food, and 15% cooked, plant-based food.
Why Plant-based Foods? Read more:
http://www.hacres.com/hallelujah-diet/explanation
Simply Raw: Reversing Diabetes in 30 Days
http://www.rawfor30days.com/
Look at the reality of the cancer research walks and runs, as far as the money that goes to the American Cancer Society and others within the main stream which are at best only looking at or for pharmaceutical drugs, and/or only improving the existing systems of delivery, in that endeavor to cure cancer. How many millions have they taken in ans spent on research that has never produced anything even close to what the public obviously was expecting and would expect from it? You will again remember how long ago it was that Richard Nixon signed the document intending to authorize the War on Cancer. In 40 years what have they gained what; after endless millions have been spent chasing a so called cancer cure? The situation with cancer has become worse, not better. If they cured a few more people, they as well had twice as many more people get cancer. They are clearly NOT looking for the real cure; not any real understanding.
They can not even get the ph issue honestly addressed, nor that sugar actually feeds cancer; they intentionally ignore it all. It has been all of it right in front of them. The cure has been there since Rene Cassie developed Essiac tea, Otto Warburg discovered what he did. Since Johanna Budwig made her discovery. Since Max Gerson made his discovery. Since Royal Rife and others made theirs. You do NOT heal with poison. The cure is found in detoxification, correction of ph, elimination of all sugars that feed cancer; and the cure is found in providing the body with the nutrition to in effect, heal itself. The medical establishment has it all backwards. They think you have to kill every pathogen and organism out there, to heal or cure anything; even if that means killing the patient before they kill the cancer. This is not the case and they have it all backwards. You can NOT patent foods and nutrients nor natural substances and products. Thus there is no major alteration of resulting chemical product which can result in a mark up of 5000% to 20,000%, as is typical. How would you ever make what they do on chemo and radiation, up to $300,000 per patient; selling organic whole foods and green vegetable and fruit juicing machines, or perhaps ESSIAC tea? How about flax seed oil and cottage cheese. Think I am kidding? This is real, all of it.
This is reality it is all at. They do not care how many needlessly suffer and die for their need of profits, obvious security, and their GREED! Burzynski, look at that issue in depth, and see what I mean. The Texas state board and the FDA have hounded and attacked him (Dr. Burzynski) for over 20 years; and still no cure, (and nor his Antineoplastons cure approved). He, Burzynski, cures brain stem and brain cancer that mainstream has never been able to cure. And the children and adults keep dying because they refuse a better way that KNOW would make standard chemo and radiation obsolete, and their high dollar drugs and, surgery, obsolete. Is this criminal in nature. If is isn't; then what exactly would qualify as criminal, and what exactly would that take, to actually be? http://www.burzynskimovie.com/
Sugar Loves Cancer
Cancer Loves Sugar
Every doctor learned back in medical school all about Otto Warburg's discovery; a discovery of humongous proportions, because way back in the thirties Otto discovered the main biochemical cause of cancer, or what differentiates a cancer cell from a normal, healthy cell. So big a discovery was this, that Otto Warburg was awarded the Nobel Prize.
Cancer has only one prime cause. It is the replacement of normal oxygen respiration of the body's cells by an anaerobic [i.e., oxygen-deficient] cell respiration. -Dr. Otto Warburg
But what else does Warburg's discovery tell us. First off, it tells us that cancer metabolizes much differently than normal cells. Normal cells need oxygen. Cancer cells despise oxygen. In fact, oxygen therapy is a favorite among many of the alternative clinics we've researched.
Another thing this tells us is that cancer metabolizes through a process of fermentation.
If you've ever made wine, you'll know that fermentation requires sugar.
The metabolism of cancer is approximately 8 times greater than the metabolism of normal cells.
Okay, so here is what we can put together knowing the above: The body is constantly overworked trying to feed this cancer. The cancer is constantly on the verge starvation and thus constantly asking the body to feed it. When the food supply is cut off, the cancer begins to starve unless it can make the body produce sugar to feed itself.
The wasting syndrome, cachexia, is the body producing sugar from proteins (you heard it right, not from carbohydrates or fats, but from proteins) in a process called glycogenesis. This sugar feeds the cancer. The body finally dies of starvation, trying to feed the cancer.
Now, knowing that one's cancer needs sugar, does it make sense to feed it sugar? Does it make sense to have a high carbohydrate diet?
The reason Food Therapies for cancer even exist today (beyond the fact that they work) is because someone once saw the connection between sugar and cancer. There are many food therapies, but not a single one allows many foods high in carbohydrates and not a single one allows sugars, BECAUSE SUGAR FEEDS CANCER.
Why doesn't your physician tell you this? Hard to tell. Maybe your doctor feels it is his job to cure your cancer, not yours. Maybe because your doctor learned about Warburg, but never put the rest together, never placed nutrition into the equation. Maybe because your physician didn't study nutrition. Heck, as late as 1978, the AMA's official position (found in the Congressional Record) was that nutrition had nothing to do with disease.
However, those who've paid attention to this sugar craving cancer stuff have come up with some remarkable therapies for cancer. Laetrile is just one. Hydrazine Sulfate, which stops the process of glycogenesis in greater than 50% of all patients with cachexia is another.
A while back (2004), at the University of Minnesota, they were experimenting with a chemotherapy delivered in a "smartbomb." Here's the scoop: the drug is wrapped in a coating that stays intact as it travels through the body, that is until it reaches a location of no oxygen. When it reaches this "no oxygen" location, the coating falls apart releasing the chemotherapy to destroy the cancer, because the only place in your body where there is no oxygen is the cancer site.
The results of this study have been buried. Nothing exists on it. There are, however, lots of articles on cancer smart bombs, but the UofMN research just cannot be found. Searching for a few key words, we've found only our article (republished at quite a few sites) mentioning this study.
Then there are the food therapies: aimed at starving cancer. Knowing what cancer loves, the cancer patient avoids them. Cancers likes cooked foods over raw (cooking destroys enzymes and heat sensitive vitamins), so check out our article on the cancer diet. And, do not forget, cancer loves sugar. If you dislike your cancer, then don't feed it.
http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/nutrition/sugar.htm
More Evidence Sugar Feeds Cancer
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2006/07/18/more-evidence-sugar-feeds-cancer.aspx
Science News
Does Sugar Feed Cancer?
Aug. 18, 2009 — Researchers at Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah have uncovered new information on the notion that sugar "feeds" tumors. The findings may also have implications for other diseases such as diabetes. The research is published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
"It's been known since 1923 that tumor cells use a lot more glucose than normal cells. Our research helps show how this process takes place, and how it might be stopped to control tumor growth," says Don Ayer, Ph.D., a Huntsman Cancer Institute investigator and professor in the Department of Oncological Sciences at the University of Utah.
During both normal and cancerous cell growth, a cellular process takes place that involves both glucose (sugar) and glutamine (an amino acid). Glucose and glutamine are both essential for cell growth, and it was long assumed they operated independently, but Ayer's research shows they are inter-dependent. He discovered that by restricting glutamine availability, glucose utilization is also stopped. "Essentially, if you don't have glutamine, the cell is short circuited due to a lack of glucose, which halts the growth of the tumor cell" Ayer says.
The research, spearheaded by Mohan Kaadige, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow in Ayer's lab, focused on MondoA, a protein that is responsible for turning genes on and off. In the presence of glutamine, MondoA blocks the expression of a gene called TXNIP. TXNIP is thought to be a tumor suppressor, but when it's blocked by MondoA , it allows cells to take up glucose, which in turn drives tumor growth. Ayer's research could lead to new drugs that would target glutamine utilization, or target MondoA or TXNIP.
Ayer says the next step in his research is to develop animal models to test his ideas about how MondoA and TXNIP control cell growth. "If we can understand that, we can break the cycle of glucose utilization which could be beneficial in the treatment of cancer," Ayer says.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090817184539.htm
Cancer & Sugar - Strategy for Selective Starvation of Cancer
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cancer-sugar-strategy-selective-starvation-cancer
Alkaline Forming Foods For A Balanced And Healthy Diet
http://www.budwigcenter.com/blog/alkaline-forming-foods-for-a-balanced-and-healthy-diet/#.US0_ajDIOWY
