9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
1. Where are the safety studies regarding the vaccine safety of the current CDC vaccine schedule?
2 Where are the vaccine safety studies regarding the known practice of injecting a small child with from 5 and up to nine or more vaccines, in a single day and office visit?
3. Where are the vaccine safety studies in regard to the safety of injecting vaccine aluminum adjuvants?
4. Where are the vaccine safety studies regarding the practice of injecting both vaccines with attenuated live viruses in them, together with as well killed vaccines with aluminum adjuvants in them.
5. Where are the studies showing the vaccine safety of vaccines which are contaminated with human diploid cell short and long chain DNA contaminants, due to the use of human diploid tissue in the growing of the vaccine antigens in childhood vaccines? Where are the vaccine safety studies in regard to any other vaccine that has been known to be contaminated with the substances that the vaccine antigen was grown on, and from?
6. Where are the vaccinated verses entirely un-vaccinated health outcome studies? Thousands of children still exist in the US, with active vaccine exemptions. The Amish community as well have had thousands of un-vaccinated children within their communities. Just because a small group of Amish were falsely fear mongered into vaccinating and ended up at a clinic in the attempt to diagnose and treat resulting childhood autism; does not mean that the entire Amish community vaccinates, and has been falsely eluded to. Obviously there is no need to not vaccinate, simply to do this study.
7. In regard to the MMR vaccine. How does the CDC as well continue to ignore this long list of studies showing the harmful effects of, the vaccine injury effects of; and as well in these studies there as well appears be an obvious MMR connection to autism? The controversy does not only revolve around a single 1998 study by Wakefield, and as well a single study connected to the CDC's, William Thompson. And the so called official word that they tell you is that any vaccine/autism link has been dis-proven, and debunked; right? Really? Lets look further.
Research References
http://www.callous-disregard.com/research.htm
Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe Official Website
http://vaxxedthemovie.com/
REP. Bill Posey Calling for an Investigation of the CDC's MMR reasearch fraud Rep. Bill Posey brings former CDC researcher and now Whistleblower, Dr. Bill Thompson's letter regarding significant files they omitted and destroyed to avoid reporting any significant race effects in their study.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4546421/rep-bill-posey-calling-investigation-cdcs-mmr-reasearch-fraud
CDC Scientist: ‘We scheduled meeting to destroy vaccine-autism study documents’
https://sharylattkisson.com/cdc-scientist-we-scheduled-meeting-to-destroy-vaccine-autism-study-documents/
8. Can you explain how it is possible in regard to the comparisons of systemic adverse reactions, for the FDA in the review and in the approval of vaccines through clinical trials, to allow the substitution of saline placebo, a replacement such as other similar vaccines which the FDA has previously approved as safe? If big pharma and the CDC are going to re-assure their claim to the public that vaccines are safe; then why are not real saline placebos required in the comparison of systemic reactions. Lets as well look at the clinical trials on Gardasil. One placebo was the aluminum adjuvant, and the other appears to be HPV virus like particles, in the vaccines carrier solution. It is all in the over 400 page document that Merck submitted to the FDA on their said Gardasil clinical trials. No wonder the comparison between the vaccine and placebo graphs appear to be so similar. And with this going on, the public is actually supposed to retain their assurances of proven vaccine safety? I think not.
9. Are you aware of the fact that SV40 a known contaminant in the early 1960's polio vaccine, is still being found in children today, and which are to young to have ever had that known contaminated vaccine? SV40 is as well known to cause benign tumors, and cancer. Are you as well aware of the fact that vaccines today still contain the unresolved risk of there being contaminants in them that can cause and create adverse health effects? Contaminants from any once living animal, or human cell source, on which the vaccine antigens were grown on and from. This is clearly a remaining unresolved problem, and as witnessed again in regard to the vaccine Gardasil.
Lets also take a look at the existing studies that allegedly show no connection between vaccines and autism. Actually, general vaccine injury, and immunological harm done, and without the evidence of autism, is an equally as serious an issue.
As for their known epidemiological studies.
And, what did they study in those so called and claimed to larger epidemiological, (population based), vaccine safety studies? In fact they only studied one single vaccine, the MMR; and one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. None of the larger epidemiological studies compared vaccinated to entirely unvaccinated. None of the studies looked at the safety profile of the entire CDC vaccine schedule. None of those studies as well looked at the safety profile of giving from 5 to up to 9 vaccines or more to and infant or small child, in a single day and office visit.
Every one of the larger MMR, and Thimerosal epidemiological studies were clearly paid for and COOKED, for the results, period. Found were the use of flawed study designs, use of unreliable data, predetermined outcomes unsupported by the data, and as well major conflicts of interest in the studies funding sources; none of them being independent and nor unbiased.
VACCINES AND AUTISM – WHAT DO EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES REALLY TELL US?
We have 16 studies already that clearly state that vaccines do not cause autism.”
-- Amy Pisani, Executive Director, Every Child By Two
“16 studies have shown no causal association between vaccines and autism, and these
studies carry weight in the scientific industry.”
-- Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC Today Show Medical Editor
“The science is largely complete. Ten epidemiological studies have shown MMR vaccine
doesn’t cause autism; six have shown thimerosal doesn’t cause autism.”
-- Dr. Paul Offit, “Autism’s False Prophets”
Read more:
http://www.rescuepost.com/files/vaccines-and-autism-epidemiology-rebuttal.pdf
14 Studies
http://www.fourteenstudies.org/
Vaccines Market worth $57.8 Billion by 2019
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/vaccines-market-worth-578-billion-by-2019-289805011.html
Dr. Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct (one very important article, to read)
http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-academic-misconduct/
Aluminum
Debunking Aluminum Adjuvant, Part 1
Debunking Aluminum Adjuvant, Part 2
The Foundation for Al Adjuvant Safety Is False
RETRACTED PAPER: Brain Damage from Al Adjuvant and Gardasil
UPDATE: Adjuvant Transport Gets Complicated
Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #1: 100mcg/kg
Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #2: 300mcg/kg
Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #3: 550mcg/kg
Toxic Aluminum Overdose From Vaccines
Dr. Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct
Vaccine Aluminum Travels Into The Brain
Natural, Science-Based Treatment for Aluminum Toxicity
Immune Activation
Response to Charges of “Cherry-Picking” (List of Abstracts)
New Kid On The Block: IL-17a
Two Vaccines With Opposite Effects On Brain Development
Part 1: Immune Activation and Autism
Part 2: Interleukin-6 and Autism
Part 3: Immune Activation Causes Autism in Monkeys
Part 4: Postnatal Immune Activation
Part 5: Vaccines and Immune Activation
Read more:
http://vaccinepapers.org/
Learn The Risk
http://www.learntherisk.org/
Topic: Vaccination: All
More vaccine-showing the harm done-studies
http://www.learntherisk.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/vaccine-risk-studies-from-GMI-2.pdf
Educate For The Vaccine Injured
http://www.educate4theinjured.org/
Facts & Science
http://www.educate4theinjured.org/the-factsscience
Antibody titers and immunity: Are they related?
http://vaclib.org/basic/titers-immunity.htm
371 - Immunity, Infectious Disease, and Vaccination - Raymond Obomsawin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtN0PMJOOjM
Trojan Horses and Clusterbombs: Dr Suzanne Humphries on aluminum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJDl_UTB65o
September 13, 2016
If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/295562-if-only-half-of-america-is-properly-vaccinated-where-are-the
The massive myth behind the vaccine industry...
https://www.facebook.com/ANHUSA/videos/10155245606839535/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED
Vaccines Provide Herd Immunity? The Herd Immunity Myth
http://www.anh-usa.org/vaccines-provide-herd-immunity/
The False Theory of Vaccine Derived - Herd Immunity
http://www.vacfacts.info/the-false-theory-of-vaccine-derived---herd-immunity.html
Educate before you vaccinate - April Renée
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llSwika86EM
------------
References for question 9.
Advances in Virus Research, Volume 50
Pages 83 and 84, read. (Also see the study titled, Simian virus 40 in humans, below on this page)
Excerpted:
Moreover, blood and sperm fluid may represent important means for spreading of SV40 in humans.
Indeed in these investigations, (Martini etal;, 1995,1996) 61% of the neoplastic patients positive for SV 40 sequences were of an age excluding exposure to SV 40-contaminated polio vaccines, suggesting contagious transmission of SV 40 by horizontal infection.
Read more:
http://books.google.com/books?id=PfO7D8ZoSMkC&pg=PA84&lpg=PA84&dq=sv40+is+contagious&source=bl&ots=AlaWsAkp95&sig=RnycQFX2ucD-3zybHQ07FAIeJYk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=kZLfT5_mA4qc2QXKz6jtCA&ved=0CFoQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=sv40%20is%20contagious&f=false
Simian virus 40 in humans
This finding may also explain the lack of difference in cancer incidence between individuals vaccinated with SV40-contaminated and SV40-free anti-polio vaccines [82]. (ii) SV40 sequences and Tag were detected in blood and sperm specimens from normal individuals and oncologic patients [80,81,83-88] and in lymphoblastoid cells [32]. These results suggest that (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) PBMCs, could be a reservoir and vehicle of SV40 spreading in the tissues of the host and among the individuals. (iii) SV40 sequences were found in urine and stoole samples, from children and adults [84,89,90], indicating that the haematic, sexual and orofecal routes of transmission are likely to be responsible for SV40 horizontal infection in humans.
Read more:
http://www.infectagentscancer.com/content/2/1/13
CDC ‘Disappears’ Page Linking Polio Vaccines To Cancer-Causing Viruses
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cdc-disappears%E2%80%99-page-linking-polio-vaccines-cancer-causing-viruses1
Compare these below original pages, which were previously existing at the CDC, to what exists now?
Cancer, Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and Polio Vaccine Fact Sheet
https://web.archive.org/web/20110307094146/http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/updates/archive/polio_and_cancer_factsheet.htm
Frequently Asked Questions about Cancer, Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and Polio Vaccine
https://web.archive.org/web/20100308102630/http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/updates/archive/polio_and_cancer.htm
SV-40 Deadly Cure
http://www.viewzone.com/sv40x.html
Simian virus 40 DNA found in US children:
http://www.dreddyclinic.com/findinformation/ww/dis_con_article_ww/wilms_tumor_1.htm
Simian Virus 40 Sequences in Human Lymphoblastoid B-Cell Lines:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC140833/
Types of SV40 Associated Cancers:
http://www.sv40foundation.org/Types.html
Simian virus 40 is present in most United States human
mesotheliomas, but it is rarely present in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10619511
Simian virus in polio shots tied to cancer / Two studies support widely disputed theory
http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Simian-virus-in-polio-shots-tied-to-cancer-Two-2865997.php
Some oral poliovirus vaccines were contaminated with infectious SV40 after 1961.
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/65/22/10273.long
“Like other polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that has been found to cause tumors and cancer,” explains RealFarmacy.com. “SV40 is believed to suppress the transcriptional properties of the tumor-suppressing genes in humans through the SV40 Large T-antigen and SV40 Small T-antigen. Mutated genes may contribute to uncontrolled cellular proliferation, leading to cancer.”
How Much of Our Cancer Epidemic is Due to SV-40?
http://www.realfarmacy.com/cancer-epidemic-sv40/
-------------------
In summary:
Simply put, they have on the pro-vaccine side of this, zero existing studies in regard to the actually multiple vaccines safety of the current CDC vaccine schedule.
If you question what I have put forth below; then lets see you produce the studies?
They have zero existing safety studies in regard the known practice of injecting into a small child anywhere from 5 and up to 9 or more vaccines, in a single day and office visit.
They have as well zero vaccine safety showing directly the safety of vaccine aluminum adjuvants.
They have zero vaccine safety studies regarding the practice of injecting both vaccines with attenuated live viruses in them, together with as well killed vaccines with aluminum adjuvants in them. Zero studies exists as to the cytokine reactivity within the immune system when combining live and killed vaccines in the same day and office visit. They never have had those studies, and never will have any such studies.
They are injecting newborns on the first day of life, with an aluminum adjuvant containing Hep B vaccine. How much for profit irresponsible, can it get?
As for their known epidemiological studies.
And what did they study in those so called and claimed to larger epidemiological, (population based), vaccine safety studies? In fact they only studied one single vaccine, the MMR; and one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. None of the larger epidemiological studies compared vaccinated to entirely unvaccinated.
None of the studies looked at the safety profile of the entire CDC vaccine schedule. None of those studies as well looked at the safety profile of giving from 5 to up to 9 vaccines or more to and infant or small child, in a single day and office visit.
No vaccine safety studies exist in regard to showing the safety of vaccine aluminum adjuvants; and while they ignore the many studies in regard toaluminum adjuvants which indeed show the harm done and as well directly the physiological mechanisms of how that vaccine injury and harm are done.
No safety studies as well exist in regard to the risk of injecting vaccines with known vaccine contamination in them; and which is yet an unresolved problem with vaccine production and manufacturing. Nothing has much changed since Maurice Hilleman stated and admitted to what he did, in regard to the previous polio vaccine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uGWut6IRfA
In fact even after what Sound Choice Pharmacuetical Institute (particularly, Teresa Deisher) found for short and long chain DNA contamination fragments in those vaccines now produced with the use of aborted fetal cells tissue; no response has been received from the CDC, and nor is any further study even being suggested. This said institute as well has found significant increases in the change points in autism diagnosis, when each and every vaccine was newly created to be developed with this said technology, and when then added into public vaccine availability, and use.
STUDIES AND RESEARCHES ON AUTISM DISORDERS
http://soundchoice.org/autism/
Vaccine Production With - Human Diploid cells (aborted fetal cell tissue)
http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-production-with---human-diploid-cells-aborted-fetal-cell---tissue.html
Vaccine Contamination
http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-contamination.html
The CDC has not done even as much as a small scale study comparing fully vaccinated to un-vaccinated health outcomes. There are plenty of existing children with vaccine exemptions they could have included in such a comparison study. Every independent study that has ever been done, clearly shows the un-vaccinated to be far healthier. A large scale study being done, is of course what the CDC fears the most. They already know what the outcome will be.
----------
More on Gardasil
Who wants this to happen to their daughter (or son), and to RISK this resulting as an outcome? They are also falling ill and dying from this shot. The vaccine makers have ZERO accountability for, and ZERO liability for vaccine injury or death. None. Zip. No penalty, no punishment, no fine, and no accountability, whatsoever. Some of the physiological mechanisms by which that this vaccine is causing that harm, and those deaths, has been outlined by those who have studied it, and obviously were qualified to study it on a physiological human health scientific basis. Just because Merck and or one their big pharma connected and based minions, did not do the studies and provide the information; they reject that information, and again only replace it with the junk science of epidemiological based numbers and as to the falsely alleged benefits of this vaccine. In their big pharma world, any alleged risks of vaccine injury harm, un-recovered from disability outcomes, and any alleged caused by the vaccine related deaths, are considered to be yet only an unproven coincidence. All of it is flat our, denied.10 years ago this vaccine was FDA approved on a fast tracked basis, and again recently and additionally also a new FDA approved, Gardasil 9 (strain) vaccine, as an improvement over the original 4 strain vaccine. There are known existing over 100 types of HPV strains. Doesn't it make you wonder why throughout human history, no one and most people had never even heard of HPV until 2006. Today it is one of the biggest and most prominent vaccine money makers that is causing an equally immense level of harm and suffering, and perhaps even more so than the old attenuated live DPT vaccine, did.
Gardasil Victim Speaks Out After 2 Years
Uploaded on Jun 3, 2009
Brittney gives an emotionally charged overview of what her life has been like for the past two years. She struggles daily with the fact her life has been forever changed. A doctor frightened her into taking the Gardasil vaccine by telling her she could get an HPV through a "possible" lab accident at college - where her blood could mingle with someone elses who had an HPV. She was never told HPV's are sexually transmitted deseases. and having no other information, she allowed herself to be given a vaccine she never needed. Now she wishes the TRUTH to be told - more testing of this vaccine is warranted before another young woman is injured..
See update for year 6 here: http://www.examiner.com/article/garda...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gCVCP8BFrU
Britt Fiste pleas for Unbiased Research on HPV Vaccines
Published on Sep 25, 2013
Our daughter's plea for unbiased research on Gardasil by public officials, Congressional hearings, researchers, and doctors to discover why this vaccine is causing so many injuries, disabilities and deaths, and to help find a cure for those injured., including herself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPl3bcp5WX4
My Gardasil Story - DANGEROUS VACCINE
Published on Dec 21, 2013
Finally sharing my story after bottling it up. I am not a coincidence. Gardasil needs to be revealed as a dangerous injection not a vaccination. No girl should ever have to go through all the pain & suffering of going in and out of hospitals.
Although I haven't had a seizure in nearly 3 years, my life isn't the same due to the side effects of all the medication. I forget a lot of things which makes it extremely hard in school when it comes to studying. And I get numbing and tingling sensations that wake me up in the middle of the night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3oVH4SMvbQ
Detection of human papillomavirus L1 gene DNA fragments in postmortem blood and spleen after Gardasil® vaccination—A case report
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=25840#.UuXeNGTna2U
Full text:
5. CONCLUSION Detection of HPV-16 L1 gene DNA fragments in non-Bconformation in postmortem blood and spleen from a person who died suddenly and unexpectedly 6 months after quadrivalent HPV vaccination has not been previously reported and warrants further investigation.
http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7300444_25840.htm
Quantifying the possible cross-reactivity risk of an HPV16 vaccine.
Kanduc D. J Exp Ther Oncol. 2009.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The potential adverse events associated with vaccination for infectious diseases underscore the need for effective analysis and definition of possible vaccine side effects. Using the HPV16 proteome as a model, we quantified the actual and theoretical risks of anti-HPV16 vaccination, and defined the potential disease spectrum derived from concomitant cross-reactions with the human organism.
METHODS: We searched the primary sequence of the HPV16 proteome for heptamer aminoacid sequences shared with human proteins using the Protein International Resource database.
RESULTS: The human proteome contains 82 heptapeptides and two octapeptides found in HPV16. The viral matches are spread among proteins involved in fundamental processes, such as cell differentiation and growth and neurosensory regulation. The human proteins containing the HPV16-derived heptamers include cell-adhesion molecules, leukocyte differentiation antigens, enzymes, proteins associated with spermatogenesis, transcription factors, and neuronal antigens. The number of viral matches and their locations make the occurrence of side autoimmune cross-reactions in the human host following HPV16-based vaccination almost unavoidable.
CONCLUSIONS: Any antigen-based vaccine needs to be carefully and thoroughly designed and critically screened for potential side effects by comparing sequence similarity at the molecular level.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/19827272/
Death after Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: Causal or Coincidental?
Conclusions: Our study suggests that HPV vaccines containing HPV-16L1 antigens pose an inherent risk for
triggering potentially fatal autoimmune vasculopathies.
http://www.rescuepost.com/files/ltshaw-death-after-quadrivalent-hpv-vaccination-pharma-reg-affairs-2012.pdf
SaneVax Announces Medical Surprise: Gardasil® HPV DNA Discovered in Post-Mortem Blood and Spleen Tissue
http://sanevax.org/sanevax-announces-medical-surprise-gardasil-hpv-dna-dicsovered-post-mortem/
Full article:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120808006480/en
HPV vaccine has done this to my child.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5GquxhjDRY
SEVERE GARDASIL INJURIES & COVER-UP! ~ Mothers Speak at NYC City Hall 1-20-16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4I1_bcj4Ow
Published on Jan 22, 2016
Mothers SPEAK about their children's reactions to Gardasil:
http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Allegations-of-Scientific-Misconduct-by-GACVS.pdf
Letter from Dr. Sin Hang Lee to Dr. Margaret Chan, Director-General of the World Health Organization and copied to: the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan (as well to as the Minster), Thomas Frieden, Director of the CDC and the Vice-Chancellor, Professor Stuart McCutcheon, The University of Auckland.
http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Allegations-of-Scientific-Misconduct-by-GACVS.pdf
Norma Erickson and Freda Birrell of the organization and site sanevax, report on Cover-up of Scientific Data. LISTEN below:
HPV Vaccine, Global Cover-up of Manipulated Science ~ Erickson, Birrell, Elkordy
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/themaryandsallieshow/2016/01/18/hpv-vaccine-global-cover-up-of-manipulated-science-erickson-birrell-elkordy
SANE VAX
http://SANEVAX.org
Judy Mikovits PhD - HPV, Gardasil risks,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtxjY3jr748
This would explain again and as well additionally and directly explain the HPV vaccine caused autoimmune disorders that have been known of and as well possibly some of the adverse reactions and un-recovered from outcomes related to both HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix.
The standard pharma directed version immunologists have simply ignored the issue of molecular mimicry, in regard to the development and use of vaccines. As well the second most irresponsible form of neglect that immunologists ignore in regard to vaccine production, is the issue and concept known as original antigenic sin. The original antigenic sin issue only involves vaccine deriving immunity, and not natural immunity.
Molecular Mimicry as a Mechanism of Autoimmune Disease, (as relates to vaccination)
Abstract
A variety of mechanisms have been suggested as the means by which infections can initiate and/or exacerbate autoimmune diseases. One mechanism is molecular mimicry, where a foreign antigen shares sequence or structural similarities with self-antigens. Molecular mimicry has typically been characterized on an antibody or T cell level. However, structural relatedness between pathogen and self does not account for T cell activation in a number of autoimmune diseases. A proposed mechanism that could have been misinterpreted for molecular mimicry is the expression of dual T cell receptors (TCR) on a single T cell. These T cells have dual reactivity to both foreign and self-antigens leaving the host vulnerable to foreign insults capable of triggering an autoimmune response. In this review, we briefly discuss what is known about molecular mimicry followed by a discussion of the current understanding of dual TCRs. Finally, we discuss three mechanisms, including molecular mimicry, dual TCRs and chimeric TCRs, by which dual reactivity of the T cell may play a role in autoimmune diseases.
Read more:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3266166/
Nordic Cochrane Research Center Files Complaint About Scientific Misconduct, Secrecy in HPV Vaccine Probe
Nordic Cochrane Center, a Danish research and information center is challenging the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) 2015 report on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines and the EMA’s position that HPV vaccine benefits outweigh the risks. After numerous reports of HPV vaccine-related brain and immune system injuries and deaths, the Danish Health and Medicines Authority asked the EMA to conduct the probe into HPV vaccine safety, but prominent physicians in the country are not convinced about the EMA’s conclusions downplaying the vaccine’s risks. On May 26, 2016, the Nordic Cochrane Center filed an official complaint charging the EMA with “maladministration” and citing flaws throughout the agency’s report. The EMA replied that it has received the complain and will respond after carefully considering all the issues raised by the research group. The Nordic Cochrane Center is an independent research and information center that is part of Cochrane, an international network of individuals and institutions committed to preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care.
Read More...
http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/nordic-cochrane-research-center-files-complaint-about-scientific-misconduct-secrecy-in-hpv-vaccine-probe/
Breaking News: Gardasil® HPV DNA discovered in post-mortem samples
http://sanevax.org/breaking-news-gardasil-hpv-dna-discovered-in-post-mortem-samples/
Tens of Thousands of Adverse Reactions to this Popular Vaccine Being Labelled “A Coincidence”
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/tens-thousands-adverse-reactions-popular-vaccine-labelled-a-coincidence/
HPV vaccine linked to deaths
http://www.junkscience.co.uk/tag/dr-chris-shaw/
In late December 2014, Sony Salzman, a 25-year-old living in New York City, heard about the approval of Gardasil 9, the latest human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine created by Merck, and called her gynecologist to ask about the vaccine. Having been vaccinated eight years ago with the previous version, simply called Gardasil, Salzman was interested in receiving the improved version of the vaccine. “But the folks at the doctor’s office had no idea there was even a new version,” Salzman says.
Chalking their ignorance up to the relative newness of the vaccine—it had only been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on 10 December—Salzman waited and then asked again in
April 2015. “I didn’t get a very clear answer on whether I could get the vaccine,” Salzman says. “
What worries some researchers is that individuals who already received vaccination against HPV will not respond to the augmented vaccine version with more strains because of an immunological concept known as ‘original antigenic sin.’
Gardasil challenge When it comes to the label recommendation for revaccination with Gardasil 9, some questions loom. In February, the ACIP voted to recommend Gardasil 9 as one of three possible vaccines a person could get to help prevent HPV infection or one of the cancers caused by the virus. However, the ACIP meeting in February was cut short owing to weather concerns, so the discussion surrounding revaccination was postponed.
Consequently, the topic of revaccination with Gardasil 9 may come up at the end of June when the ACIP will have the second of its three annual meetings in Atlanta.
The current indication for Gardasil 9, which was approved by the FDA in December 2014, is for boys and girls who have never been vaccinated with any type of HPV vaccine before.
Merck has tested Gardasil 9 in girls and women who have already received the older, quadrivalent version of Gardasil, but so far these tests have only looked at safety and immunogenicity.
Preliminary unpublished results from this trial showed that the production of antibodies against the four viral types common to both versions of the vaccine increased slightly in this group
compared with those who received Gardasil 9 and had never been previously immunized against HPV. However, antibody titers against the five added viral strains in Gardasil 9 among the former group were only 25% and 63% of that seen in people who received Gardasil 9 alone.
Merck is reluctant to provide advice on revaccination on the basis of these preliminary results. “We don’t know what [the reduced antibody titer] means,” Vichnin says. “This information is provided to physicians and patients, and it’s an individual decision.”
The ACIP has also hesitated to make a recommendation. “There’s some data but it’s mostly safety data,” Markowitz says. “But there’s not an indication for revaccination on the label [of the vaccine].” There have been cost-effectiveness data collected by the CDC but they haven’t been formally presented yet.
Read more:
http://moscow.sci-hub.cc/304d0ce5621349c755e6db81da6f1231/chakradhar2015.pdf
Allegations of Scientific Misconduct by GACVS/WHO/CDC Representatives et al
An open-letter of complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan
http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Allegations-of-Scientific-Misconduct-by-GACVS.pdf
HPV Vaccine Maker’s Study Proves Natural HPV Infection Beneficial, Not Deadly
Written By: Kelly Brogan, M.D. and Sayer Ji, Founder
Behind every vaccine is an assumption. That HPV causes cervical cancer, that cervical cancer causes death, and that a vaccine can effectively interfere with this linear relationship is the assumption to be examined in this article. Cervarix is a vaccine recommended to girls beginning as early as 9 years old, intended to protect against HPV strains 16 and 18 upon completion of a 3 dose series. It is an aluminum-containing product, with notable "immunogenicity".
A new GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) funded study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases has revealed that HPV infection, resulting in naturally acquired human papilloma virus (HPV) antibodies, reduces the risk for new infection and cervical abnormalities linked to cancer in non-HPV vaccinated subjects.
In addition to this startling finding – additional GSK-funded research from this year revealed that the HPV vaccine may not protect women against high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, dysplasias.
If, in fact, the HPV vaccines do not work as widely advertised, and natural HPV infectious exposures actually protect against the progression of HPV linked cervical changes to cancer, then taken together, both these findings challenge the most fundamental assumptions within vaccine science (aka vaccinology), and render highly dubious the oft repeated rhetoric that natural HPV infection is juggernaut –like deadly force the best defense against which are universal immunization campaigns.
HPV Infection Protects Against New Infection and Cervical 'Premalignancies'
The groundbreaking new study titled, Risk of newly detected infections and cervical abnormalities in women seropositive for naturally-acquired HPV-16/18 antibodies: analysis of the control arm of PATRICIA, analyzed data from the non-vaccinated control arm of the Papilloma Trial against Cancer in Young Adults (PATRICIA), to ascertain whether natural HPV16 and HPV18 antibodies reduced the risk for new HPV infection and/or cervical abnormalities over a 300 day period. A total of 16,656 women were included in the study's control arm (8,193 women in the HPV16 analysis and 8,463 women in the HPV18 analysis), with none of the women being administered the HPV vaccine.
It should be noted that this is one of the first studies to look at the natural history of HPV infection and immunity, as well as one of the first studies to show the validity of using the control arm data from vaccine efficacy trials. The control arm did, however, receive three doses of the Hepatitis A vaccine. As there are no vaccine studies in existence using a true non-vaccinated control group, the natural incidence of a disease, as well as the true risks of a vaccine cannot be effectively assessed.
The study found that the presence of natural antibodies against HPV16, considered one of the most malignant of the over 120 unique types identified, lowered the risk for newly detected infection and a type of abnormal pap smear result known as ASC-US+ or 'atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance'. The same protective effect was found for natural HPV18 antibodies, only to a lesser extent.
............
2. It appears there is a correlation between antibodies related to infection and protection from dysplasia (cellular abnormalities) rather than infection progressing definitively to cancer. The commonly held notion that naturally transmitted HPV infection and subsequent elevation of antibody titers is a disease process that leads inevitably to tissue pathology and possibly precancer or cancer, rather than an instance of the immune system effectively meeting the HPV viral challenging and responding with an appropriate antibody response, conferring lasting immunity, is debunked by this new study. Clearly, natural infection not only prevents reinfection, but even reduces the risk of HPV's potential induction of dysplastic cellular changes associated with cancer.
READ more:
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/hpv-vaccine-maker-s-study-shows-natural-hpv-infection-beneficial-not-deadly
HPV vaccine may not protect women against high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, dysplasias
Mahmud SM. J Clin Oncol. 2014;doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.51.4265.
http://www.healio.com/hematology-oncology/cancer-prevention/news/online/%7B0c273308-2b91-4dcf-89a5-f12d84a8e6e9%7D/hpv-vaccine-may-not-protect-women-against-high-grade-squamous-intraepithelial-lesions-dysplasias
Vaccination may contribute to causing a wide variety of autoimmune disorders.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20193633
HPV Vaccine Can Make You Susceptible to More Serious Strains of HPV
Women Vaccinated for HPV May Be at Higher Risk of HPV Infection
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/05/05/hpv-vaccine-gardasil.aspx
Human papilloma virus vaccine and primary ovarian failure: another facet of the autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23902317
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/human-papilloma-virus-vaccine-and-primary-ovarian-failure-another-facet
Human papilloma virus vaccine and primary ovarian failure: another facet of the autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
Did Merck Deceive FDA About Gardasil Vaccine Research Omitting Data Concerning Ovarian Failure?
by Cynthia A. Janak
Health Impact News
Comments by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News
Could the Research Design Measure Ovarian Dysfunction?
The American College of Pediatricians stated:
Few other vaccines besides Gardasil® that are administered in adolescence contain polysorbate 80. Pre-licensure safety trials for Gardasil® used placebo that contained polysorbate 80 as well as aluminum adjuvant. Therefore, if such ingredients could cause ovarian dysfunction, an increase in amenorrhea probably would not have been detected in the placebo controlled trials. Furthermore, a large number of girls in the original trials were taking hormonal contraceptives which can mask ovarian dysfunction including amenorrhea and ovarian failure. Thus a causal relationship between human papillomavirus vaccines (if not Gardasil® specifically) and ovarian dysfunction cannot be ruled out at this time.
While data from those studies do not indicate an increased rate of amenorrhea after vaccination, the essential lack of saline placebos and the majority of participants taking hormonal contraceptives in those studies preclude meaningful data to rule out an effect on ovarian function. [1]
Read more:
https://healthimpactnews.com/2016/did-merck-deceive-fda-about-gardasil-vaccine-research-omitting-data-concerning-ovarian-failure/
New Concerns about the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine
https://www.acpeds.org/the-college-speaks/position-statements/health-issues/new-concerns-about-the-human-papillomavirus-vaccine
Cynthia A. Janak column - Gardasil
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak
Cynthia Janak and Britt Fiste: “Gardasil Damage Explained” Feb 4
http://holyhormones.com/vaccinations/cynthia-janak-and-britt-fiste-gardasil-damage-explained-feb-4/
--------------
My response to Antonio Baduy Cámara, and the blog Skeptical Raptor, as to their response to 9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxer's
http://www.vacfacts.info/my-response-to-antonio-baduy-caacutemara-and-the-blog-skeptical-raptor-as-to-their-response-to-9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html
1. Where are the safety studies regarding the vaccine safety of the current CDC vaccine schedule?
2 Where are the vaccine safety studies regarding the known practice of injecting a small child with from 5 and up to nine or more vaccines, in a single day and office visit?
3. Where are the vaccine safety studies in regard to the safety of injecting vaccine aluminum adjuvants?
4. Where are the vaccine safety studies regarding the practice of injecting both vaccines with attenuated live viruses in them, together with as well killed vaccines with aluminum adjuvants in them.
5. Where are the studies showing the vaccine safety of vaccines which are contaminated with human diploid cell short and long chain DNA contaminants, due to the use of human diploid tissue in the growing of the vaccine antigens in childhood vaccines? Where are the vaccine safety studies in regard to any other vaccine that has been known to be contaminated with the substances that the vaccine antigen was grown on, and from?
6. Where are the vaccinated verses entirely un-vaccinated health outcome studies? Thousands of children still exist in the US, with active vaccine exemptions. The Amish community as well have had thousands of un-vaccinated children within their communities. Just because a small group of Amish were falsely fear mongered into vaccinating and ended up at a clinic in the attempt to diagnose and treat resulting childhood autism; does not mean that the entire Amish community vaccinates, and has been falsely eluded to. Obviously there is no need to not vaccinate, simply to do this study.
7. In regard to the MMR vaccine. How does the CDC as well continue to ignore this long list of studies showing the harmful effects of, the vaccine injury effects of; and as well in these studies there as well appears be an obvious MMR connection to autism? The controversy does not only revolve around a single 1998 study by Wakefield, and as well a single study connected to the CDC's, William Thompson. And the so called official word that they tell you is that any vaccine/autism link has been dis-proven, and debunked; right? Really? Lets look further.
Research References
http://www.callous-disregard.com/research.htm
Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe Official Website
http://vaxxedthemovie.com/
REP. Bill Posey Calling for an Investigation of the CDC's MMR reasearch fraud Rep. Bill Posey brings former CDC researcher and now Whistleblower, Dr. Bill Thompson's letter regarding significant files they omitted and destroyed to avoid reporting any significant race effects in their study.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4546421/rep-bill-posey-calling-investigation-cdcs-mmr-reasearch-fraud
CDC Scientist: ‘We scheduled meeting to destroy vaccine-autism study documents’
https://sharylattkisson.com/cdc-scientist-we-scheduled-meeting-to-destroy-vaccine-autism-study-documents/
8. Can you explain how it is possible in regard to the comparisons of systemic adverse reactions, for the FDA in the review and in the approval of vaccines through clinical trials, to allow the substitution of saline placebo, a replacement such as other similar vaccines which the FDA has previously approved as safe? If big pharma and the CDC are going to re-assure their claim to the public that vaccines are safe; then why are not real saline placebos required in the comparison of systemic reactions. Lets as well look at the clinical trials on Gardasil. One placebo was the aluminum adjuvant, and the other appears to be HPV virus like particles, in the vaccines carrier solution. It is all in the over 400 page document that Merck submitted to the FDA on their said Gardasil clinical trials. No wonder the comparison between the vaccine and placebo graphs appear to be so similar. And with this going on, the public is actually supposed to retain their assurances of proven vaccine safety? I think not.
9. Are you aware of the fact that SV40 a known contaminant in the early 1960's polio vaccine, is still being found in children today, and which are to young to have ever had that known contaminated vaccine? SV40 is as well known to cause benign tumors, and cancer. Are you as well aware of the fact that vaccines today still contain the unresolved risk of there being contaminants in them that can cause and create adverse health effects? Contaminants from any once living animal, or human cell source, on which the vaccine antigens were grown on and from. This is clearly a remaining unresolved problem, and as witnessed again in regard to the vaccine Gardasil.
Lets also take a look at the existing studies that allegedly show no connection between vaccines and autism. Actually, general vaccine injury, and immunological harm done, and without the evidence of autism, is an equally as serious an issue.
As for their known epidemiological studies.
And, what did they study in those so called and claimed to larger epidemiological, (population based), vaccine safety studies? In fact they only studied one single vaccine, the MMR; and one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. None of the larger epidemiological studies compared vaccinated to entirely unvaccinated. None of the studies looked at the safety profile of the entire CDC vaccine schedule. None of those studies as well looked at the safety profile of giving from 5 to up to 9 vaccines or more to and infant or small child, in a single day and office visit.
Every one of the larger MMR, and Thimerosal epidemiological studies were clearly paid for and COOKED, for the results, period. Found were the use of flawed study designs, use of unreliable data, predetermined outcomes unsupported by the data, and as well major conflicts of interest in the studies funding sources; none of them being independent and nor unbiased.
VACCINES AND AUTISM – WHAT DO EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES REALLY TELL US?
We have 16 studies already that clearly state that vaccines do not cause autism.”
-- Amy Pisani, Executive Director, Every Child By Two
“16 studies have shown no causal association between vaccines and autism, and these
studies carry weight in the scientific industry.”
-- Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC Today Show Medical Editor
“The science is largely complete. Ten epidemiological studies have shown MMR vaccine
doesn’t cause autism; six have shown thimerosal doesn’t cause autism.”
-- Dr. Paul Offit, “Autism’s False Prophets”
Read more:
http://www.rescuepost.com/files/vaccines-and-autism-epidemiology-rebuttal.pdf
14 Studies
http://www.fourteenstudies.org/
Vaccines Market worth $57.8 Billion by 2019
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/vaccines-market-worth-578-billion-by-2019-289805011.html
Dr. Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct (one very important article, to read)
http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-academic-misconduct/
Aluminum
Debunking Aluminum Adjuvant, Part 1
Debunking Aluminum Adjuvant, Part 2
The Foundation for Al Adjuvant Safety Is False
RETRACTED PAPER: Brain Damage from Al Adjuvant and Gardasil
UPDATE: Adjuvant Transport Gets Complicated
Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #1: 100mcg/kg
Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #2: 300mcg/kg
Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #3: 550mcg/kg
Toxic Aluminum Overdose From Vaccines
Dr. Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct
Vaccine Aluminum Travels Into The Brain
Natural, Science-Based Treatment for Aluminum Toxicity
Immune Activation
Response to Charges of “Cherry-Picking” (List of Abstracts)
New Kid On The Block: IL-17a
Two Vaccines With Opposite Effects On Brain Development
Part 1: Immune Activation and Autism
Part 2: Interleukin-6 and Autism
Part 3: Immune Activation Causes Autism in Monkeys
Part 4: Postnatal Immune Activation
Part 5: Vaccines and Immune Activation
Read more:
http://vaccinepapers.org/
Learn The Risk
http://www.learntherisk.org/
Topic: Vaccination: All
More vaccine-showing the harm done-studies
http://www.learntherisk.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/vaccine-risk-studies-from-GMI-2.pdf
Educate For The Vaccine Injured
http://www.educate4theinjured.org/
Facts & Science
http://www.educate4theinjured.org/the-factsscience
Antibody titers and immunity: Are they related?
http://vaclib.org/basic/titers-immunity.htm
371 - Immunity, Infectious Disease, and Vaccination - Raymond Obomsawin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtN0PMJOOjM
Trojan Horses and Clusterbombs: Dr Suzanne Humphries on aluminum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJDl_UTB65o
September 13, 2016
If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/295562-if-only-half-of-america-is-properly-vaccinated-where-are-the
The massive myth behind the vaccine industry...
https://www.facebook.com/ANHUSA/videos/10155245606839535/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED
Vaccines Provide Herd Immunity? The Herd Immunity Myth
http://www.anh-usa.org/vaccines-provide-herd-immunity/
The False Theory of Vaccine Derived - Herd Immunity
http://www.vacfacts.info/the-false-theory-of-vaccine-derived---herd-immunity.html
Educate before you vaccinate - April Renée
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llSwika86EM
------------
References for question 9.
Advances in Virus Research, Volume 50
Pages 83 and 84, read. (Also see the study titled, Simian virus 40 in humans, below on this page)
Excerpted:
Moreover, blood and sperm fluid may represent important means for spreading of SV40 in humans.
Indeed in these investigations, (Martini etal;, 1995,1996) 61% of the neoplastic patients positive for SV 40 sequences were of an age excluding exposure to SV 40-contaminated polio vaccines, suggesting contagious transmission of SV 40 by horizontal infection.
Read more:
http://books.google.com/books?id=PfO7D8ZoSMkC&pg=PA84&lpg=PA84&dq=sv40+is+contagious&source=bl&ots=AlaWsAkp95&sig=RnycQFX2ucD-3zybHQ07FAIeJYk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=kZLfT5_mA4qc2QXKz6jtCA&ved=0CFoQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=sv40%20is%20contagious&f=false
Simian virus 40 in humans
This finding may also explain the lack of difference in cancer incidence between individuals vaccinated with SV40-contaminated and SV40-free anti-polio vaccines [82]. (ii) SV40 sequences and Tag were detected in blood and sperm specimens from normal individuals and oncologic patients [80,81,83-88] and in lymphoblastoid cells [32]. These results suggest that (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) PBMCs, could be a reservoir and vehicle of SV40 spreading in the tissues of the host and among the individuals. (iii) SV40 sequences were found in urine and stoole samples, from children and adults [84,89,90], indicating that the haematic, sexual and orofecal routes of transmission are likely to be responsible for SV40 horizontal infection in humans.
Read more:
http://www.infectagentscancer.com/content/2/1/13
CDC ‘Disappears’ Page Linking Polio Vaccines To Cancer-Causing Viruses
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cdc-disappears%E2%80%99-page-linking-polio-vaccines-cancer-causing-viruses1
Compare these below original pages, which were previously existing at the CDC, to what exists now?
Cancer, Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and Polio Vaccine Fact Sheet
https://web.archive.org/web/20110307094146/http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/updates/archive/polio_and_cancer_factsheet.htm
Frequently Asked Questions about Cancer, Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and Polio Vaccine
https://web.archive.org/web/20100308102630/http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/updates/archive/polio_and_cancer.htm
SV-40 Deadly Cure
http://www.viewzone.com/sv40x.html
Simian virus 40 DNA found in US children:
http://www.dreddyclinic.com/findinformation/ww/dis_con_article_ww/wilms_tumor_1.htm
Simian Virus 40 Sequences in Human Lymphoblastoid B-Cell Lines:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC140833/
Types of SV40 Associated Cancers:
http://www.sv40foundation.org/Types.html
Simian virus 40 is present in most United States human
mesotheliomas, but it is rarely present in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10619511
Simian virus in polio shots tied to cancer / Two studies support widely disputed theory
http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Simian-virus-in-polio-shots-tied-to-cancer-Two-2865997.php
Some oral poliovirus vaccines were contaminated with infectious SV40 after 1961.
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/65/22/10273.long
“Like other polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that has been found to cause tumors and cancer,” explains RealFarmacy.com. “SV40 is believed to suppress the transcriptional properties of the tumor-suppressing genes in humans through the SV40 Large T-antigen and SV40 Small T-antigen. Mutated genes may contribute to uncontrolled cellular proliferation, leading to cancer.”
How Much of Our Cancer Epidemic is Due to SV-40?
http://www.realfarmacy.com/cancer-epidemic-sv40/
-------------------
In summary:
Simply put, they have on the pro-vaccine side of this, zero existing studies in regard to the actually multiple vaccines safety of the current CDC vaccine schedule.
If you question what I have put forth below; then lets see you produce the studies?
They have zero existing safety studies in regard the known practice of injecting into a small child anywhere from 5 and up to 9 or more vaccines, in a single day and office visit.
They have as well zero vaccine safety showing directly the safety of vaccine aluminum adjuvants.
They have zero vaccine safety studies regarding the practice of injecting both vaccines with attenuated live viruses in them, together with as well killed vaccines with aluminum adjuvants in them. Zero studies exists as to the cytokine reactivity within the immune system when combining live and killed vaccines in the same day and office visit. They never have had those studies, and never will have any such studies.
They are injecting newborns on the first day of life, with an aluminum adjuvant containing Hep B vaccine. How much for profit irresponsible, can it get?
As for their known epidemiological studies.
And what did they study in those so called and claimed to larger epidemiological, (population based), vaccine safety studies? In fact they only studied one single vaccine, the MMR; and one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. None of the larger epidemiological studies compared vaccinated to entirely unvaccinated.
None of the studies looked at the safety profile of the entire CDC vaccine schedule. None of those studies as well looked at the safety profile of giving from 5 to up to 9 vaccines or more to and infant or small child, in a single day and office visit.
No vaccine safety studies exist in regard to showing the safety of vaccine aluminum adjuvants; and while they ignore the many studies in regard toaluminum adjuvants which indeed show the harm done and as well directly the physiological mechanisms of how that vaccine injury and harm are done.
No safety studies as well exist in regard to the risk of injecting vaccines with known vaccine contamination in them; and which is yet an unresolved problem with vaccine production and manufacturing. Nothing has much changed since Maurice Hilleman stated and admitted to what he did, in regard to the previous polio vaccine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uGWut6IRfA
In fact even after what Sound Choice Pharmacuetical Institute (particularly, Teresa Deisher) found for short and long chain DNA contamination fragments in those vaccines now produced with the use of aborted fetal cells tissue; no response has been received from the CDC, and nor is any further study even being suggested. This said institute as well has found significant increases in the change points in autism diagnosis, when each and every vaccine was newly created to be developed with this said technology, and when then added into public vaccine availability, and use.
STUDIES AND RESEARCHES ON AUTISM DISORDERS
http://soundchoice.org/autism/
Vaccine Production With - Human Diploid cells (aborted fetal cell tissue)
http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-production-with---human-diploid-cells-aborted-fetal-cell---tissue.html
Vaccine Contamination
http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-contamination.html
The CDC has not done even as much as a small scale study comparing fully vaccinated to un-vaccinated health outcomes. There are plenty of existing children with vaccine exemptions they could have included in such a comparison study. Every independent study that has ever been done, clearly shows the un-vaccinated to be far healthier. A large scale study being done, is of course what the CDC fears the most. They already know what the outcome will be.
----------
More on Gardasil
Who wants this to happen to their daughter (or son), and to RISK this resulting as an outcome? They are also falling ill and dying from this shot. The vaccine makers have ZERO accountability for, and ZERO liability for vaccine injury or death. None. Zip. No penalty, no punishment, no fine, and no accountability, whatsoever. Some of the physiological mechanisms by which that this vaccine is causing that harm, and those deaths, has been outlined by those who have studied it, and obviously were qualified to study it on a physiological human health scientific basis. Just because Merck and or one their big pharma connected and based minions, did not do the studies and provide the information; they reject that information, and again only replace it with the junk science of epidemiological based numbers and as to the falsely alleged benefits of this vaccine. In their big pharma world, any alleged risks of vaccine injury harm, un-recovered from disability outcomes, and any alleged caused by the vaccine related deaths, are considered to be yet only an unproven coincidence. All of it is flat our, denied.10 years ago this vaccine was FDA approved on a fast tracked basis, and again recently and additionally also a new FDA approved, Gardasil 9 (strain) vaccine, as an improvement over the original 4 strain vaccine. There are known existing over 100 types of HPV strains. Doesn't it make you wonder why throughout human history, no one and most people had never even heard of HPV until 2006. Today it is one of the biggest and most prominent vaccine money makers that is causing an equally immense level of harm and suffering, and perhaps even more so than the old attenuated live DPT vaccine, did.
Gardasil Victim Speaks Out After 2 Years
Uploaded on Jun 3, 2009
Brittney gives an emotionally charged overview of what her life has been like for the past two years. She struggles daily with the fact her life has been forever changed. A doctor frightened her into taking the Gardasil vaccine by telling her she could get an HPV through a "possible" lab accident at college - where her blood could mingle with someone elses who had an HPV. She was never told HPV's are sexually transmitted deseases. and having no other information, she allowed herself to be given a vaccine she never needed. Now she wishes the TRUTH to be told - more testing of this vaccine is warranted before another young woman is injured..
See update for year 6 here: http://www.examiner.com/article/garda...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gCVCP8BFrU
Britt Fiste pleas for Unbiased Research on HPV Vaccines
Published on Sep 25, 2013
Our daughter's plea for unbiased research on Gardasil by public officials, Congressional hearings, researchers, and doctors to discover why this vaccine is causing so many injuries, disabilities and deaths, and to help find a cure for those injured., including herself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPl3bcp5WX4
My Gardasil Story - DANGEROUS VACCINE
Published on Dec 21, 2013
Finally sharing my story after bottling it up. I am not a coincidence. Gardasil needs to be revealed as a dangerous injection not a vaccination. No girl should ever have to go through all the pain & suffering of going in and out of hospitals.
Although I haven't had a seizure in nearly 3 years, my life isn't the same due to the side effects of all the medication. I forget a lot of things which makes it extremely hard in school when it comes to studying. And I get numbing and tingling sensations that wake me up in the middle of the night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3oVH4SMvbQ
Detection of human papillomavirus L1 gene DNA fragments in postmortem blood and spleen after Gardasil® vaccination—A case report
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=25840#.UuXeNGTna2U
Full text:
5. CONCLUSION Detection of HPV-16 L1 gene DNA fragments in non-Bconformation in postmortem blood and spleen from a person who died suddenly and unexpectedly 6 months after quadrivalent HPV vaccination has not been previously reported and warrants further investigation.
http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7300444_25840.htm
Quantifying the possible cross-reactivity risk of an HPV16 vaccine.
Kanduc D. J Exp Ther Oncol. 2009.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The potential adverse events associated with vaccination for infectious diseases underscore the need for effective analysis and definition of possible vaccine side effects. Using the HPV16 proteome as a model, we quantified the actual and theoretical risks of anti-HPV16 vaccination, and defined the potential disease spectrum derived from concomitant cross-reactions with the human organism.
METHODS: We searched the primary sequence of the HPV16 proteome for heptamer aminoacid sequences shared with human proteins using the Protein International Resource database.
RESULTS: The human proteome contains 82 heptapeptides and two octapeptides found in HPV16. The viral matches are spread among proteins involved in fundamental processes, such as cell differentiation and growth and neurosensory regulation. The human proteins containing the HPV16-derived heptamers include cell-adhesion molecules, leukocyte differentiation antigens, enzymes, proteins associated with spermatogenesis, transcription factors, and neuronal antigens. The number of viral matches and their locations make the occurrence of side autoimmune cross-reactions in the human host following HPV16-based vaccination almost unavoidable.
CONCLUSIONS: Any antigen-based vaccine needs to be carefully and thoroughly designed and critically screened for potential side effects by comparing sequence similarity at the molecular level.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/19827272/
Death after Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: Causal or Coincidental?
Conclusions: Our study suggests that HPV vaccines containing HPV-16L1 antigens pose an inherent risk for
triggering potentially fatal autoimmune vasculopathies.
http://www.rescuepost.com/files/ltshaw-death-after-quadrivalent-hpv-vaccination-pharma-reg-affairs-2012.pdf
SaneVax Announces Medical Surprise: Gardasil® HPV DNA Discovered in Post-Mortem Blood and Spleen Tissue
http://sanevax.org/sanevax-announces-medical-surprise-gardasil-hpv-dna-dicsovered-post-mortem/
Full article:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120808006480/en
HPV vaccine has done this to my child.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5GquxhjDRY
SEVERE GARDASIL INJURIES & COVER-UP! ~ Mothers Speak at NYC City Hall 1-20-16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4I1_bcj4Ow
Published on Jan 22, 2016
Mothers SPEAK about their children's reactions to Gardasil:
http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Allegations-of-Scientific-Misconduct-by-GACVS.pdf
Letter from Dr. Sin Hang Lee to Dr. Margaret Chan, Director-General of the World Health Organization and copied to: the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan (as well to as the Minster), Thomas Frieden, Director of the CDC and the Vice-Chancellor, Professor Stuart McCutcheon, The University of Auckland.
http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Allegations-of-Scientific-Misconduct-by-GACVS.pdf
Norma Erickson and Freda Birrell of the organization and site sanevax, report on Cover-up of Scientific Data. LISTEN below:
HPV Vaccine, Global Cover-up of Manipulated Science ~ Erickson, Birrell, Elkordy
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/themaryandsallieshow/2016/01/18/hpv-vaccine-global-cover-up-of-manipulated-science-erickson-birrell-elkordy
SANE VAX
http://SANEVAX.org
Judy Mikovits PhD - HPV, Gardasil risks,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtxjY3jr748
This would explain again and as well additionally and directly explain the HPV vaccine caused autoimmune disorders that have been known of and as well possibly some of the adverse reactions and un-recovered from outcomes related to both HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix.
The standard pharma directed version immunologists have simply ignored the issue of molecular mimicry, in regard to the development and use of vaccines. As well the second most irresponsible form of neglect that immunologists ignore in regard to vaccine production, is the issue and concept known as original antigenic sin. The original antigenic sin issue only involves vaccine deriving immunity, and not natural immunity.
Molecular Mimicry as a Mechanism of Autoimmune Disease, (as relates to vaccination)
Abstract
A variety of mechanisms have been suggested as the means by which infections can initiate and/or exacerbate autoimmune diseases. One mechanism is molecular mimicry, where a foreign antigen shares sequence or structural similarities with self-antigens. Molecular mimicry has typically been characterized on an antibody or T cell level. However, structural relatedness between pathogen and self does not account for T cell activation in a number of autoimmune diseases. A proposed mechanism that could have been misinterpreted for molecular mimicry is the expression of dual T cell receptors (TCR) on a single T cell. These T cells have dual reactivity to both foreign and self-antigens leaving the host vulnerable to foreign insults capable of triggering an autoimmune response. In this review, we briefly discuss what is known about molecular mimicry followed by a discussion of the current understanding of dual TCRs. Finally, we discuss three mechanisms, including molecular mimicry, dual TCRs and chimeric TCRs, by which dual reactivity of the T cell may play a role in autoimmune diseases.
Read more:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3266166/
Nordic Cochrane Research Center Files Complaint About Scientific Misconduct, Secrecy in HPV Vaccine Probe
Nordic Cochrane Center, a Danish research and information center is challenging the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) 2015 report on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines and the EMA’s position that HPV vaccine benefits outweigh the risks. After numerous reports of HPV vaccine-related brain and immune system injuries and deaths, the Danish Health and Medicines Authority asked the EMA to conduct the probe into HPV vaccine safety, but prominent physicians in the country are not convinced about the EMA’s conclusions downplaying the vaccine’s risks. On May 26, 2016, the Nordic Cochrane Center filed an official complaint charging the EMA with “maladministration” and citing flaws throughout the agency’s report. The EMA replied that it has received the complain and will respond after carefully considering all the issues raised by the research group. The Nordic Cochrane Center is an independent research and information center that is part of Cochrane, an international network of individuals and institutions committed to preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care.
Read More...
http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/nordic-cochrane-research-center-files-complaint-about-scientific-misconduct-secrecy-in-hpv-vaccine-probe/
Breaking News: Gardasil® HPV DNA discovered in post-mortem samples
http://sanevax.org/breaking-news-gardasil-hpv-dna-discovered-in-post-mortem-samples/
Tens of Thousands of Adverse Reactions to this Popular Vaccine Being Labelled “A Coincidence”
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/tens-thousands-adverse-reactions-popular-vaccine-labelled-a-coincidence/
HPV vaccine linked to deaths
http://www.junkscience.co.uk/tag/dr-chris-shaw/
In late December 2014, Sony Salzman, a 25-year-old living in New York City, heard about the approval of Gardasil 9, the latest human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine created by Merck, and called her gynecologist to ask about the vaccine. Having been vaccinated eight years ago with the previous version, simply called Gardasil, Salzman was interested in receiving the improved version of the vaccine. “But the folks at the doctor’s office had no idea there was even a new version,” Salzman says.
Chalking their ignorance up to the relative newness of the vaccine—it had only been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on 10 December—Salzman waited and then asked again in
April 2015. “I didn’t get a very clear answer on whether I could get the vaccine,” Salzman says. “
What worries some researchers is that individuals who already received vaccination against HPV will not respond to the augmented vaccine version with more strains because of an immunological concept known as ‘original antigenic sin.’
Gardasil challenge When it comes to the label recommendation for revaccination with Gardasil 9, some questions loom. In February, the ACIP voted to recommend Gardasil 9 as one of three possible vaccines a person could get to help prevent HPV infection or one of the cancers caused by the virus. However, the ACIP meeting in February was cut short owing to weather concerns, so the discussion surrounding revaccination was postponed.
Consequently, the topic of revaccination with Gardasil 9 may come up at the end of June when the ACIP will have the second of its three annual meetings in Atlanta.
The current indication for Gardasil 9, which was approved by the FDA in December 2014, is for boys and girls who have never been vaccinated with any type of HPV vaccine before.
Merck has tested Gardasil 9 in girls and women who have already received the older, quadrivalent version of Gardasil, but so far these tests have only looked at safety and immunogenicity.
Preliminary unpublished results from this trial showed that the production of antibodies against the four viral types common to both versions of the vaccine increased slightly in this group
compared with those who received Gardasil 9 and had never been previously immunized against HPV. However, antibody titers against the five added viral strains in Gardasil 9 among the former group were only 25% and 63% of that seen in people who received Gardasil 9 alone.
Merck is reluctant to provide advice on revaccination on the basis of these preliminary results. “We don’t know what [the reduced antibody titer] means,” Vichnin says. “This information is provided to physicians and patients, and it’s an individual decision.”
The ACIP has also hesitated to make a recommendation. “There’s some data but it’s mostly safety data,” Markowitz says. “But there’s not an indication for revaccination on the label [of the vaccine].” There have been cost-effectiveness data collected by the CDC but they haven’t been formally presented yet.
Read more:
http://moscow.sci-hub.cc/304d0ce5621349c755e6db81da6f1231/chakradhar2015.pdf
Allegations of Scientific Misconduct by GACVS/WHO/CDC Representatives et al
An open-letter of complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan
http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Allegations-of-Scientific-Misconduct-by-GACVS.pdf
HPV Vaccine Maker’s Study Proves Natural HPV Infection Beneficial, Not Deadly
Written By: Kelly Brogan, M.D. and Sayer Ji, Founder
Behind every vaccine is an assumption. That HPV causes cervical cancer, that cervical cancer causes death, and that a vaccine can effectively interfere with this linear relationship is the assumption to be examined in this article. Cervarix is a vaccine recommended to girls beginning as early as 9 years old, intended to protect against HPV strains 16 and 18 upon completion of a 3 dose series. It is an aluminum-containing product, with notable "immunogenicity".
A new GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) funded study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases has revealed that HPV infection, resulting in naturally acquired human papilloma virus (HPV) antibodies, reduces the risk for new infection and cervical abnormalities linked to cancer in non-HPV vaccinated subjects.
In addition to this startling finding – additional GSK-funded research from this year revealed that the HPV vaccine may not protect women against high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, dysplasias.
If, in fact, the HPV vaccines do not work as widely advertised, and natural HPV infectious exposures actually protect against the progression of HPV linked cervical changes to cancer, then taken together, both these findings challenge the most fundamental assumptions within vaccine science (aka vaccinology), and render highly dubious the oft repeated rhetoric that natural HPV infection is juggernaut –like deadly force the best defense against which are universal immunization campaigns.
HPV Infection Protects Against New Infection and Cervical 'Premalignancies'
The groundbreaking new study titled, Risk of newly detected infections and cervical abnormalities in women seropositive for naturally-acquired HPV-16/18 antibodies: analysis of the control arm of PATRICIA, analyzed data from the non-vaccinated control arm of the Papilloma Trial against Cancer in Young Adults (PATRICIA), to ascertain whether natural HPV16 and HPV18 antibodies reduced the risk for new HPV infection and/or cervical abnormalities over a 300 day period. A total of 16,656 women were included in the study's control arm (8,193 women in the HPV16 analysis and 8,463 women in the HPV18 analysis), with none of the women being administered the HPV vaccine.
It should be noted that this is one of the first studies to look at the natural history of HPV infection and immunity, as well as one of the first studies to show the validity of using the control arm data from vaccine efficacy trials. The control arm did, however, receive three doses of the Hepatitis A vaccine. As there are no vaccine studies in existence using a true non-vaccinated control group, the natural incidence of a disease, as well as the true risks of a vaccine cannot be effectively assessed.
The study found that the presence of natural antibodies against HPV16, considered one of the most malignant of the over 120 unique types identified, lowered the risk for newly detected infection and a type of abnormal pap smear result known as ASC-US+ or 'atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance'. The same protective effect was found for natural HPV18 antibodies, only to a lesser extent.
............
2. It appears there is a correlation between antibodies related to infection and protection from dysplasia (cellular abnormalities) rather than infection progressing definitively to cancer. The commonly held notion that naturally transmitted HPV infection and subsequent elevation of antibody titers is a disease process that leads inevitably to tissue pathology and possibly precancer or cancer, rather than an instance of the immune system effectively meeting the HPV viral challenging and responding with an appropriate antibody response, conferring lasting immunity, is debunked by this new study. Clearly, natural infection not only prevents reinfection, but even reduces the risk of HPV's potential induction of dysplastic cellular changes associated with cancer.
READ more:
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/hpv-vaccine-maker-s-study-shows-natural-hpv-infection-beneficial-not-deadly
HPV vaccine may not protect women against high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, dysplasias
Mahmud SM. J Clin Oncol. 2014;doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.51.4265.
http://www.healio.com/hematology-oncology/cancer-prevention/news/online/%7B0c273308-2b91-4dcf-89a5-f12d84a8e6e9%7D/hpv-vaccine-may-not-protect-women-against-high-grade-squamous-intraepithelial-lesions-dysplasias
Vaccination may contribute to causing a wide variety of autoimmune disorders.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20193633
HPV Vaccine Can Make You Susceptible to More Serious Strains of HPV
Women Vaccinated for HPV May Be at Higher Risk of HPV Infection
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/05/05/hpv-vaccine-gardasil.aspx
Human papilloma virus vaccine and primary ovarian failure: another facet of the autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23902317
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/human-papilloma-virus-vaccine-and-primary-ovarian-failure-another-facet
Human papilloma virus vaccine and primary ovarian failure: another facet of the autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
Did Merck Deceive FDA About Gardasil Vaccine Research Omitting Data Concerning Ovarian Failure?
by Cynthia A. Janak
Health Impact News
Comments by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News
Could the Research Design Measure Ovarian Dysfunction?
The American College of Pediatricians stated:
Few other vaccines besides Gardasil® that are administered in adolescence contain polysorbate 80. Pre-licensure safety trials for Gardasil® used placebo that contained polysorbate 80 as well as aluminum adjuvant. Therefore, if such ingredients could cause ovarian dysfunction, an increase in amenorrhea probably would not have been detected in the placebo controlled trials. Furthermore, a large number of girls in the original trials were taking hormonal contraceptives which can mask ovarian dysfunction including amenorrhea and ovarian failure. Thus a causal relationship between human papillomavirus vaccines (if not Gardasil® specifically) and ovarian dysfunction cannot be ruled out at this time.
While data from those studies do not indicate an increased rate of amenorrhea after vaccination, the essential lack of saline placebos and the majority of participants taking hormonal contraceptives in those studies preclude meaningful data to rule out an effect on ovarian function. [1]
Read more:
https://healthimpactnews.com/2016/did-merck-deceive-fda-about-gardasil-vaccine-research-omitting-data-concerning-ovarian-failure/
New Concerns about the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine
https://www.acpeds.org/the-college-speaks/position-statements/health-issues/new-concerns-about-the-human-papillomavirus-vaccine
Cynthia A. Janak column - Gardasil
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak
Cynthia Janak and Britt Fiste: “Gardasil Damage Explained” Feb 4
http://holyhormones.com/vaccinations/cynthia-janak-and-britt-fiste-gardasil-damage-explained-feb-4/
--------------
My response to Antonio Baduy Cámara, and the blog Skeptical Raptor, as to their response to 9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxer's
http://www.vacfacts.info/my-response-to-antonio-baduy-caacutemara-and-the-blog-skeptical-raptor-as-to-their-response-to-9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html
